Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Breaking an Oath

2019-06-18 Thread Jason Cobb
Well, if as I understand it, the chain of JUSTICE is (intended to be) as follows: Commit a crime -> Someone points eir finger -> Investigator investigates -> Investigator finds guilty (assume so) -> Investigator imposes the COLD HAND OF JUSTICE, which is the done by applying a fine. Everythi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Breaking an Oath

2019-06-18 Thread Rebecca
Fines can be levied, surely, per the revised version of CFJ 3736, which says they CAN, but not by announcement On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:13 PM D. Margaux wrote: > As stated, this CFJ is trivially FALSE because no fine CAN be imposed for > anything. Maybe there is a different way to pose the CFJ

DIS: Re: BUS: Breaking an Oath

2019-06-18 Thread D. Margaux
As stated, this CFJ is trivially FALSE because no fine CAN be imposed for anything. Maybe there is a different way to pose the CFJ that would be PARADOXICAL though? > On Jun 16, 2019, at 1:25 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > Oooh look, I broke my Oath. How unexpected! > > I point my finger at Jason

DIS: Re: BUS: Breaking an Oath

2019-06-15 Thread Rebecca
Gratuitous Argument The Pledge rule states that "N is 2 unless the pledge explicitly states otherwise". But it doesn't say what N is when the pledge _does_ explicitly state otherwise. Therefore, N is indeterminate and there is no explicit Class for this crime, so it defaults to a base value of 2.