Never mind, this was really 36_6_4.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:22 PM Rebecca wrote:
> Okay, there are two CFJ 3644s. This one and the one regarding Humiliating
> Public Reminders (which appears as an Annotation in the FLR). Was this
> resolved?
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:24 PM Timon Walshe-Grey
Okay, there are two CFJ 3644s. This one and the one regarding Humiliating
Public Reminders (which appears as an Annotation in the FLR). Was this
resolved?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:24 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> == CFJ 3644 ==
>
> C
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
(on a side note, should I start publishing these again after cases
are complete? I'm entering them into the database once a month or
so).
It's nice to see it all at once, especially if the judge doesn't quote
everything relevant.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
This format of report used to be used officially by the Arbitor,
when that was going on, it was typically done with a comment field
something like this:
> Judged TRUE by twg: [as of this message]
(on a side note, should I start publishing these again after cases
are complet
Bugger, got my time zones mixed up. This was, of course, judged at 10:24, not
11:24.
This is my first ever CFJ judgement - please do not hesitate to say if I got
something wrong.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 18, 2018 10:24 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey
wrote:
> ==
5 matches
Mail list logo
