On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:08 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
> Recuse D. Margaux? What good would that do?
Kick the can down the road until the rule can be fixed.
> Also not really something we can force upon em...
We can't force em to judge any particular way either.
I vote FALSE, DISMISS
From: agora-business on behalf of Jason
Cobb
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 6:03:37 AM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: BUS: CFJ 3737: non-binding agoran decision
I vote {TRUE, PARADOXICAL (totally not out of self interest),
I put equal weight on TRUE and DISMISS. (Sorry, this email is more of
an argument than a vote.)
It may be TRUE by R. Lee's argument about limits. (Sorry if I got
TRUE/FALSE mixed up there.) If not, it should be DISMISS.
First of all, I think this business of judges not legally being able
to
Also not really something we can force upon em...
Jason Cobb
On 6/21/19 1:10 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
Recuse D. Margaux? What good would that do?
On 6/20/19 10:47 PM, omd wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:37 PM Rebecca
wrote:
I would like us all to informally vote TRUE, FALSE, PARADOXICAL,
Recuse D. Margaux? What good would that do?
On 6/20/19 10:47 PM, omd wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:37 PM Rebecca wrote:
I would like us all to informally vote TRUE, FALSE, PARADOXICAL, DISMISS or
IRRELEVANT on CFJ 3737, the subject of so much discussion in the other
thread. This would help
Mumbles something about instant-runoff only working for entities and
voting [Rule 2125, Agora, G., Aris, Corona].
Jason Cobb
On 6/21/19 12:38 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
If we’re doing this, it should be instant runoff.
-Aris
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:37 PM Rebecca wrote:
I would like us
I mean it's totally informal, so I hereby decree instant run-off and vote
TRUE, IRRELEVANT
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 2:38 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we’re doing this, it should be instant runoff.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:37 PM Rebecca wrote:
If we’re doing this, it should be instant runoff.
-Aris
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:37 PM Rebecca wrote:
> I would like us all to informally vote TRUE, FALSE, PARADOXICAL, DISMISS or
> IRRELEVANT on CFJ 3737, the subject of so much discussion in the other
> thread. This would help to determine
8 matches
Mail list logo
