I meant to ask about that. Is there a reason all of these terms use the "-or" suffix even when normal English would use "-er"?

Jason Cobb

On 6/17/19 1:04 AM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 00:58 -0400, omd wrote:
CFJ: In Rule 2125, "required to be a recordkeepor" refers only to
recordkeepors as defined in Rule 2166.

Arguments:

Or is it simply an ordinary-language reference to the act of keeping
records?
Gratutious: since when was "recordkeepor" "ordinary language"?

The word probably only exists in the Agoran dialect of English (I did a
web search, and the entirety of the first page of results was Agora-
related) and thus is inherently tied to Agoran definitions, even out of
context.

Reply via email to