OscarMeyr wrote:
That is, in part, the idea. Saying Zefram is an avocado -- or
passing a proposal establishing Goethe is a banana -- or
transferring elements of a Rules-defined private property to France
-- does not automatically make it so.
But it might make it so in the interpretation
On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I DISMISS CFJ 1614. The status of Zefram being an avocado -- indeed,
of any player being any type of foodstuff -- is not relevant to the
Rules.
This judgement is a judicial admission that personhood is not
restricted to
2 matches
Mail list logo
