I slightly mind, but I probably would have done the same thing so meh. Also,
come to think of it, I also abused that contract to your detriment, so maybe
this is just karma.
Gaelan
> On Feb 18, 2019, at 3:36 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> Good point! Based on his recent hashes, he probably is. T
I think you need to retract the previous ballots first (though "changing" a
vote is accepted shorthand)
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, February 18, 2019 11:36 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> Good point! Based on his recent hashes, he probably is. Therefore:
>
> If Aris’s message ini
Hold on, are we sure G. isn't in on it?
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, February 18, 2019 11:31 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> Like Gaelan, I do the following, and I cause ATMunn to do the following:
>
> - object to any intents announced in the quoted message.
> - if quoted messa
3 matches
Mail list logo
