DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ratify

2008-09-18 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:28 -0400, comex wrote: > I intend, without objection, to ratify the Short Logical Ruleset I > most recently published. Generally speaking, I look with skeptical eyes whenever comex tries to ratify anything, but that report looks correct to me. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ratify

2007-08-13 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On 8/13/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is anyone going to own up to triggering the web form? Proto-CFJ: {{{ A message sent by a Player to a Public Forum announcing that e performs some action satisfies Rule 478's definition of Announcement even if the message is sent by a means that ma

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ratify

2007-08-13 Thread Ed Murphy
Peekee wrote: Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I intend to ratify the VC holdings listed in the Assessor's Report that I published within the past hour. Could that cause problems if it turns out I am not a player anymore? In that situation, the first paragraph of Rule 2126 would cau

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ratify

2007-08-13 Thread Peekee
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I intend to ratify the VC holdings listed in the Assessor's Report that I published within the past hour. Could that cause problems if it turns out I am not a player anymore? -- Peekee