On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> wasn't this overhauled? in a cfj by alexis banning future conditionals
> in votes? i don't know where I am anymore.
Proposal 7922 last October fixed the Rule to make it absolutely clear
that it's evaluated at the end of the voting period. IIRC it was
wasn't this overhauled? in a cfj by alexis banning future conditionals
in votes? i don't know where I am anymore.
Situationally, though, it evaluates as FOR. ais's hypothetical
situation in which infinite people vote that way means only that if
infinite people voted with this conditional, the
Nope, votes are the exception to that. Votes are evaluated at the time
of resolution.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Rebecca wrote:
> We evaluate votes at the time they are cast (iirc, unless we added
> future conditionals back in). This vote, under the
We evaluate votes at the time they are cast (iirc, unless we added
future conditionals back in). This vote, under the circumstances, was
a conditional with sufficient context within the game state. If
somebody made a vote like this without any previous context, it may be
ambiguous. Under these
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 09:22 +1000, Rebecca wrote:
> Corona voted in this way
> "> I vote on these proposals in such a manner that, in a hypothetical
> > alternate gamestate identical to the current one except for me never
> > sending the message immediately before this one, and this message not
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
