Kerim Aydin wrote:
>(see CFJ 1575 for
>a more far-fetched forcing that worked).
Interesting. In reading through the judicial rules when I registered, I
perceived considerable wooliness around such issues, so I'm not surprised
by problems like that.
>It is interesting to note that (I think) earli
Zefram wrote:
My intent with the motions was to force assignment of judges regardless
of what state the CFJs were in. I'm not at all clear on whether they've
been legally judged.
I understood that intent, and it should work and force a judicial
assignment even after the CotC dismissed the cas
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>However, there is nothing to indicate that a "dismiss" by CotC due
>to excess is in fact "judgement."
The Stare Decisis list does not distinguish between CotC dismissal and
dismissal by a trial judge. I'm not aware of any formal precedent one
way or the other, though.
My inte
3 matches
Mail list logo
