On 2/28/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sigh. But that's the point. If you're not going to grant partnerships
any benefits of registering why regulate them at all? It's just a
wasted Rule.
Voting Credits.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can't prove anything."
-- Gödel's Incom
Eris wrote:
Simpler -- don't give Partnerships any free votes.
Sigh. But that's the point. If you're not going to grant partnerships
any benefits of registering why regulate them at all? It's just a
wasted Rule.
Murphy has a proposal which says "persons are natural persons only",
which ve
On 2/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even given that those M people might agree to create additional
partnerships out of proper subsets, thus forming a bloc of 2^M-1
voters (including the natural persons)? Granted, this is Not
Easy, either.
Simpler -- don't give Partnerships any fr
Murphy wrote:
While leaving both contracts in effect.
But "both" contracts would only be one person, so they couldn't
both register.
Even given that those M people might agree to create additional
partnerships out of proper subsets, thus forming a bloc of 2^M-1
voters (including the natural
Goethe wrote:
How about something more radical and simple? Leave "persons" as
referring to all types of persons (not just natural), but insert
a single sentence "persons consisting of the same set of natural
persons are the same person". This would limit the arbitrary
issue, and puts partnersh
Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Civil unions
(AI = 3, please)
After some thought, and with thanks for the writing, I'm not sure
I agree with this approach. What it does is impose regulations
without benefits... by limiting the "personhood" of partnerships,
you've turned them into agreements
Goethe wrote:
Murphy wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, each natural person who is part
of a player that is not a natural person is awarded the Patent Title
of Denny Crane.
I object to this being treated as a cheap scam (whose perpetrators
could be bought off with trinkets) rather t
Murphy wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, each natural person who is part
of a player that is not a natural person is awarded the Patent Title
of Denny Crane.
I object to this being treated as a cheap scam (whose perpetrators
could be bought off with trinkets) rather than as a legitima
8 matches
Mail list logo
