Levi Stephen wrote:
The annotation shall be the Statement
of the CFJ and the judgement of that CFJ.
I prefer the feature of the present arrangement that the body of the
annotation is a well-formed sentence which is to be interpreted as true.
So for CFJs that are
On 6/7/07, Levi Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Removal of 'The Rulekeeper may remove' annotations. Seems like this
gives them a choice they shouldn't have.
Are you talking about this provision of rule 789/7?
The Rulekeepor may remove such an annotation only if that Rule
is
2 matches
Mail list logo
