On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
24 hours having passed, QAZ has been revoked. Now that this is done,
explain what could've been done to stop this?
Um, you need to do the actual action. With Notice is a dependent action,
not automatic at the end of the period.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
Nope. Need to post a new intent.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
> Interestingly - a change of the speakers objection state doesn't remove
> disatisfaction.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:34 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Use QAZ to object, objection comes from Speaker means intent
Interestingly - a change of the speakers objection state doesn't remove
disatisfaction.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:34 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Use QAZ to object, objection comes from Speaker means intent can't be
> acted on (Satisfaction).
>
> Counterplay: Each objection to a single intent
Use QAZ to object, objection comes from Speaker means intent can't be acted on
(Satisfaction).
Counterplay: Each objection to a single intent counts as an action. Post N+1
intents where
N is the number of players who might use QAZ. Can't all be objected to in 24
hours.
I also initially
Because currently you can't modify or create new agencies with QAZ I think
i'm fine?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:17 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Well, not actually doing it lol, but for the sport of figuring out methods
> and cool things.
>
> (I agree with that QAZ should leave regardless)
>
>
> On Wed
I can't think of any ways that would postpone this more than 24 hours or so at
most, if Quazie responds appropriately to defend against attempts. Thinking of
the defenses was a slightly-interesting puzzle, happy to share after QAZ is
actually gone.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Wel
Well, not actually doing it lol, but for the sport of figuring out methods
and cool things.
(I agree with that QAZ should leave regardless)
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is possible that such a method potentially exists. Howeve
It is possible that such a method potentially exists. However, I don't
think it would be particularly sporting to use it if it did, so I'm
not going to say anything more than that.
-Aris
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> For the sport of it, would there be a way to prevent th
For the sport of it, would there be a way to prevent this?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I intend to revoke QAZ in 24 hours.
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
