> On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I could write an Agency with that same thing + output, for example, something
> like:
>
> ---*---
> Any agent may take 1 shiny from Cuddlebeam and the following clause has no
> effect.
>
> Any agent may take 2 shiny from Cuddlebeam and t
There's a CFJ to the effect of "unless it's explicitly written in an Instrument
of power,
loops and paradoxes are just thrown out altogether as being ambiguous as per
needing
to specify actions clearly (R478). If there's an explicit rule/instrument that
sets it up
and takes precedence over ot
I could write an Agency with that same thing + output, for example,
something like:
---*---
Any agent may take 1 shiny from Cuddlebeam and the following clause has no
effect.
Any agent may take 2 shiny from Cuddlebeam and the previous clause has no
effect.
---*---
Then summon a CFJ for if someon
Interesting question.
I'd say it does have the potential to break things, but that it's a known
feature.
i.e. if we put something broken in a Rule via a proposal, then we'd have
to say "it's our fault, we shouldn't have voted for it." It's really the
same (only) protection against bad proposal
On Sep 20, 2017, at 2:38 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Without addressing the question of whether a proposal can have direct effects
> on other proposals without enacting a rule change (a complicated question
> under rule 2140), it seems clear that a proposal can have effects beyond rule
> change
5 matches
Mail list logo
