Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2482a
�Appeal 2482a �
I opine REASSIGN. Precedence is only defined where there is
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
* since precedence is not explicitly defined where there is no
conflict, R217 defines it in that case.
The text is silent, but if there's no conflict then there's no need
for precedence to be defined and I'd
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I don't believe I can change my opinion after publishing it, but I'd
be fine with OVERRULE to IRRELEVANT or FALSE.
With 3/5 opinions locked in, the only options unless the panel acts
unanimously are REASSIGN, AFFIRM (no error rating), or (by default)
3 matches
Mail list logo
