Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation
I vividly remember resolving a PM election in favour of K, who deregistered midway through the voting period but still one: and I also remember reading the rules quite carefully to support that conclusion (which nobody disputed). That's the only precedent I can recall. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > In general, nothing prevents valid options from changing during the > voting period. > > For example, in the previous version of elections (before we had a > nomination period), the valid options were lists of players. If > someone registered midway through an election, they could become > valid (and likewise if someone deregistered they ceased to be valid). > > At least, I think this is how it worked - can't remember when it was > last tested with a CFJ. > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> No, it doesn't iirc. Valid votes are fixed at the initiation, I'm 90% >> sure (not 100%). >> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Telnaior wrote: >> > Oh yeah, I was wondering if it'd mean anything but we may as well find out: >> > >> > I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour. >> > >> > Does that make me a valid vote (assuming my judgement falls in a way that >> > makes this declaration possible)? >> > >> > >> > >> > On 2017-11-13 10:45, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Obviously, I vote for G. >> >> >> >> In the interests of fairness, I should point out that's it's >> >> conceivable that others can jump in late (depending on the >> >> pending judgement), and also allowing it to fail quorum is >> >> always an option. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation
In general, nothing prevents valid options from changing during the voting period. For example, in the previous version of elections (before we had a nomination period), the valid options were lists of players. If someone registered midway through an election, they could become valid (and likewise if someone deregistered they ceased to be valid). At least, I think this is how it worked - can't remember when it was last tested with a CFJ. On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > No, it doesn't iirc. Valid votes are fixed at the initiation, I'm 90% > sure (not 100%). > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Telnaior wrote: > > Oh yeah, I was wondering if it'd mean anything but we may as well find out: > > > > I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour. > > > > Does that make me a valid vote (assuming my judgement falls in a way that > > makes this declaration possible)? > > > > > > > > On 2017-11-13 10:45, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >>> > >>> Obviously, I vote for G. > >> > >> In the interests of fairness, I should point out that's it's > >> conceivable that others can jump in late (depending on the > >> pending judgement), and also allowing it to fail quorum is > >> always an option. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation
No, it doesn't iirc. Valid votes are fixed at the initiation, I'm 90% sure (not 100%). On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Telnaior wrote: > Oh yeah, I was wondering if it'd mean anything but we may as well find out: > > I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour. > > Does that make me a valid vote (assuming my judgement falls in a way that > makes this declaration possible)? > > > > On 2017-11-13 10:45, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >>> Obviously, I vote for G. >> >> In the interests of fairness, I should point out that's it's >> conceivable that others can jump in late (depending on the >> pending judgement), and also allowing it to fail quorum is >> always an option. >> >> >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation
Hasn't the "Medal of Honour" fix passed? I don't want it to fail quorum though, you legitemately got no cards last month et cetera. And nobody else jumped in. You shouldn't be punished for that. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> Obviously, I vote for G. > > In the interests of fairness, I should point out that's it's > conceivable that others can jump in late (depending on the > pending judgement), and also allowing it to fail quorum is > always an option. > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > Obviously, I vote for G. In the interests of fairness, I should point out that's it's conceivable that others can jump in late (depending on the pending judgement), and also allowing it to fail quorum is always an option.
