Sgeo wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
6351 D 2 2.0 C-walkernone
AGAINST (Please also secure ceasing to be a Senator if you're going to
secure becoming a Senator.)
I change my vote on 6351 to AGAINST, for the same
2009/6/10 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
ENDORSE... a trustworthy player
If this was a valid vote, I retract it, and vote AGAINST instead.
If
Sgeo wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
I change this vote to FOR.
Ineffective, you can't directly change a vote.
c-walker wrote:
6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
ENDORSE... a trustworthy player
If this was a valid vote, I retract it, and vote AGAINST instead.
It wasn't, so you don't.
6351 D 2 2.0 C-walker none
Endorse Sgeo, or PRESENT if e doesn't vote on this
That happens automatically now.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
nickname before it passes. I shall also insist on the long version after
it passes and violate the rule in civil protest. If you choose to blot me
I vote as follows:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
PRESENT
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR
6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
FOR
6347 O 0 1.0 coppro Ribbon cleanup
FOR
6348 O 1 1.0 coppro B Friends
FOR
6349 D 1 2.0 Pavitra
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
nickname before it passes. I shall also insist on the long version after
it passes
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
nickname before it passes. I shall also
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:07, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
The rule uses SHOULD not SHALL. Officers are only encouraged to use
the official nickname, not required to do so.
Nice. Punishment for no purpose. Now *that's* treating Agora right
good forever.
I shall choose no official nickname whatsoever, refer to
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeosgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
H. Assessor: please evaluate this as a conditional vote evaluating to no vote :P
Sgeo wrote:
AGAINST -- It's probably my imagination, but I think that could be
interpreted to mean that once those conditions come about, anyone can
destroy any rests..
If so, the bug is in the current Ruleset (but harder to exploit).
Wooble wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeosgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
H. Assessor: please evaluate this as a conditional vote evaluating to no vote
:P
Done, on the grounds
14 matches
Mail list logo
