DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-15 Thread VJ Rada
I haven't checked but I'm also pretty sure you could get rid of murphy. On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Josh T wrote: > NB: Bayushi has objected to them being deregistered on the 12th. > > 天火狐 > > > > > On 15 September 2017 at 17:52, Nic Evans wrote: >> >> >> >> On 09/11/17 15:50, Nic Evans wro

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-12 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: Rule 1551: "When a public document is ratified, rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the gamestate is modified to what it would be if, at the time the ratified document was published, the gamestate had been minimally modified to make the ratified docum

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-12 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: 7887* Aris 3.0 SLR Ratification Aris1 sh. AGAINST. I’m strongly pro-ruleset-ratification, as it has not been done since well before I joined the game. However, ratifying that version at this point in the sequence of pr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-11 Thread Aris Merchant
It doesn't need to set the effective date of the ratified state. Rule 1551: "When a public document is ratified, rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the gamestate is modified to what it would be if, at the time the ratified document was published, the gamestate had been minimally modified to ma

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-11 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:40 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> >>> 7887* Aris 3.0 SLR Ratification Aris1 sh. >> >> AGAINST. >> >> I’m strongly pro-ruleset-ratification, as it has not been done since well >>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-11 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > I vote as follows. > >> ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee >> --- >> 7876* o 2.0 Float On o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-11 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: Why the switcheroo on university funding? E's circumventing eir own pledge. Not very good at holding a grudge I guess. :P Greetings, Ørjan.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-11 Thread Gaelan Steele
Why the switcheroo on university funding? >> On Sep 11, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Nic Evans wrote: >> >> On 09/10/17 20:19, Aris Merchant wrote: >> [A few comments: >> 1. I probably got something wrong. If I did, I'm sorry. It would be nice if >> people could point my errors out, and help fix them (not

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > > 7884* V.J Rada 3.0 Mother, May I? V.J Rada1 sh. > PRESENT; I get CAN/MAY wrong all the time but I'll defer to the more > modally-inclined players on whether this is good. I'm not sure it's problematic, but I'd rather wait and see

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7876-7898 [sic]

2017-09-10 Thread VJ Rada
> 7876* o 2.0 Float On o 1 AP FOR >7877* CB [1]1.0 Monsters CB [1] 1 AP AGAINST unused game mechanics. >1878* Gaelan1.0 Not So Cuddly NowAris1 sh. AGAINST > 7879* o, Aris 1.0 You can