On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:00:50 +
woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
7721 Tiger 3.0 Restricted distribution
AGAINST (What is this IMPOSSIBLE for any player to distribute
escape hatch for if you're pragmatizing distributability?)
I think we should keep this escape hatch. For such an
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
7723 Henri 1.0 Single line feed
AGAINST.
I'm shocked you'd vote AGAINST. I can't even find a *hypothetical*
problem with any of the changes being proposed.
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:12:50 -0500
Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
In fact, I've made another mistake; the text of Tiger's 7721 was
also wrong. So here's another revision:
I hereby distribute each listed
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
Well, I messed up by forgetting the part about the proposal
distribution doesn't have anything to do with my report. I'll try and
clean up the situation now.
No problem. I just needed to CoE to prevent the decisions' existences
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
7723 Henri 1.0 Single line feed
AGAINST.
I'm shocked you'd vote AGAINST. I can't even find a *hypothetical*
problem with any of the changes being proposed.
What? _All_ of the changes
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:04:21 -0500
Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
Well, I messed up by forgetting the part about the proposal
distribution doesn't have anything to do with my report. I'll try
and clean up the
6 matches
Mail list logo
