Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Kindly RTF follow-up.
Yes, I saw that (and Quazie's claim of error) immediately after posting.
Sorry.
Your correction was not to the PF, btw. Don't think that makes much
difference, now that we don't have the formal COE procedure any more.
-zefram
On Apr 13, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Do you have a link to the agoranomic
archive of the Pineapple Partnership delivering judgment?
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/
2007-March/006180.html
Thanks
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Do you have a link to the agoranomic
archive of the Pineapple Partnership delivering judgment?
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-March/006180.html
-zefram
On Apr 12, 2007, at 5:26 AM, Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Pineapple Partnership, c/o Zefram and Goethe
1 2 0
Didn't the Pineapple Partnership get a VC for judging?
-zefram
I can't find the records, and it probably happened when I had my mind
on something
On Mar 23, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Zefram 1 1 0
I should have a VC for delivering judgement, and I expect several
other
players should too. Since 2007-01-22, R2126 includes:
A player who submits a judgement during eir
Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Zefram 1 1 0
I should have a VC for delivering judgement, and I expect several other
players should too. Since 2007-01-22, R2126 includes:
A player who submits a judgement during eir Deliberation Period
gains one VC. A
6 matches
Mail list logo
