DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Aris Merchant]

I opine in favor of a forgivable one blot fine, and recommend the words
"tardiness", "game", "verisimilitude", "spirit", "incoherence",
"celebration", "wrath", "assiduity", "impurity", and "supersubtilize". I
further request that the apology contain a portion referring to the Spirit
of the Game, which would contain two of the words on my suggested list.

-Aris

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 9:04 PM Ned Strange 
wrote:

> I poiint a finger at G. for not publishing a Registrar report last week.
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Kerim Aydin 
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 
> > 
> >  Registrar's Weekly Report
> > 
> > 
> >
> > Date of last report: 27 Apr 2018
> > Date of this report: 04 May 2018
> > (all times UTC)
> >
> > (इसका पता लगाएं, मेल क्लाइंट edition)
> >
> > Recent Events (recent events section not ratifying)
> >   01-Apr-18 20:41:27   G. flips Publius Scribonius Scholasticus' master
> >switch to Agora.
> >   02-Apr-18 17:42:50   Zombie auction begins for pokes, o, Publius
> >Scribonius Scholasticus, nichdel, Quazie
> >   03-Apr-18 15:14:11   Ouri registers.  Welcome, Ouri!
> >   09-Apr-18 17:42:50   Zombie auction ends.
> >   09-Apr-18 17:55:58   omd pays auction price of 21 coins for the zombie
> >pokes.
> >   09-Apr-18 17:55:58   G. pays auction price of 21 coins for the zombie
> o.
> >   09-Apr-18 17:55:58   Registrar flips pokes' master switch to omd.
> >   09-Apr-18 17:55:58   Registrar flips o's master switch to G.
> >   10-Apr-18 01:12:02   V.J. Rada pays auction price of 12 coins for the
> >zombie Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
> >   10-Apr-18 01:31:35   Registrar flips Publius Scribonius Scholasticus'
> >master switch to V.J. Rada.
> >   10-Apr-18 05:23:17   Corona pays auction price of 5 coins for the
> zombie
> >Quazie.
> >   10-Apr-18 05:36:54   Registrar flips Quazie's master switch to Corona.
> >   10-Apr-18 13:28:06   ATMunn pays auction price of 10 coins for nichdel.
> >   10-Apr-18 13:35:34   Registrar flips nichdel's master switch to ATMunn.
> >   17-Apr-18 21:34:31   Trigon flips 天火狐's master switch to Agora.
> >   17-Apr-18 21:34:31   Trigon flips Telnaior's master switch to Agora.
> >
> >   (time of last report)
> >
> >
> > Players (19) (by Rule 869, Persons with 'Registered' Citizenship,
> z=zombie)
> >
> >  Player   Contact
> >  Registered
> >  --   ---
> >  --
> >  Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com   13 Sep
> > 16
> >  Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com  15 May
> > 17
> >  G.   kerim at u.washington.edu   25 Aug
> > 17
> >  Cuddle Beam  cuddlebeam at gmail.com 25 Aug
> > 17
> >  Trigon   reuben.staley at gmail.com  24 Sep
> > 17
> >  Corona   liliumalbum.agora at gmail.com  17 Nov
> > 17
> >  Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com   17 Dec
> > 17
> >  VJ Rada  edwardostrange at gmail.com 29 Dec
> > 17
> >  Kenyon   kprater3.14 at gmail.com27 Feb
> > 18
> >  ATMunn   iamingodsarmy at gmail.com  11 Mar
> > 18
> >  Ouri ouri.poupko at gmail.com03 Apr
> > 18
> >   z  omd  comexk at gmail.com [3] 03 Feb
> > 11
> >   z  oowen at grimoire.ca 12 Jul
> > 16
> >   z  Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com15 Apr
> > 17
> >   z  P. Scholasticus [1]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com[2] 16 Apr
> > 17
> >   z  nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com29 Jun
> > 17
> >   z  pokespokes at botnoise.org   11 Dec
> > 17
> >   z  天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com   06 Nov
> 16
> >   z  Telnaior jdga at iinet.net.au20 Oct
> > 17
> >
> > [1] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> > [2] officially, but technically equivalent p.scribonius.scholasticus at
> > googlemail.com
> > [3] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at gmail.com
> >
> >
> > Non-default Master Switches (Player:value, self-ratifying)
> >
> >  omd  : G.
> >  Quazie   : Corona
> >  nichdel  : ATMunn
> >  o: G.
> >  pokes: omd
> >  Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: V.J. Rada
> >  Telnaior : Agora
> >  天火狐: Agora
> >
> >
> > Non-default Emotion Switches (Player:value, self-ratifying)
> >
> >  nichdel : Joyous
> >  Alexis  : Melancholy
> >  

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

I'll have to go and investigate that.

On 01/14/2018 08:35 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
>> 
>>    Registrar's Weekly Report
>> 
>
> COE: You did not list the Master switches (I recall that Quazie is not
> eir own master).
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.

-- 

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Aris Merchant]

I think that because there is no requirement that the report be in one
message, it probably doesn't need to be. However, there is a requirement
that the report contain certain information. It thus seems reasonable that
the report is published at the moment its last component is published, and
the set of documents constituting the report becomes complete. I think this
interpretation harmonizes the relevant rules with the game custom that
reports can be several documents, something I've heard around before.

-Aris

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:56 PM VJ Rada  wrote:

> >>The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a convenience
> for the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention in
> the last couple of years, not a >>matter of the rules.
>
> Uh this is a bit of alternative facts, o.
>
> From rule 2162 "That officer's (weekly, if not specified otherwise)report
>  includes the value of each
> instance of that switch  whose
> value is not its default value;"
> From rule 2139: "The Registrar's weekly report
>  includes"
>
> The phrase "weekly report" appears 16 times in the rules. A report should
> be construed as a single document, not as a weekly list of spread-out
> duties.
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:
>
> > Some gratuity:
> >
> > > On Nov 4, 2017, at 6:06 PM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> > >
> > > I AP CFJ the following: The below document claiming to be the
> > Registrar's Weekly Report was not a report.
> > >
> > > Arguments: The Registrar is required to track Emotion switches (2514)..
> > E didn’t.
> >
> > The idea of “a report” as a single, complete, and self-contained document
> > appears nowhere in the rules. It is permissible, as far as I can tell,
> for
> > an officer to separately report each family of reportable facts, so long
> as
> > the results were unambiguous and correct.
> >
> > The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a convenience
> > for the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention
> in
> > the last couple of years, not a matter of the rules. Failing to report
> the
> > values of emotion switches does breach a rule - but it doesn’t
> invalidate a
> > report which is missing that information.
> >
> > -o
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Owen Jacobson]

> On Nov 7, 2017, at 3:02 AM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> 
> lmao sorry if accusing you of "alternative facts" is rude,

Not at all! I’d prefer that incorrect readings were bought to my attention, 
because otherwise, how am I to learn?

-o



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[VJ Rada]

lmao sorry if accusing you of "alternative facts" is rude,

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:

>
> > On Nov 7, 2017, at 1:56 AM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> >
> >>> The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a
> convenience
> > for the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention
> in
> > the last couple of years, not a >>matter of the rules.
> >
> > Uh this is a bit of alternative facts, o.
> >
> >> From rule 2162 "That officer's (weekly, if not specified
> otherwise)report
> >  includes the value of each
> > instance of that switch  whose
> > value is not its default value;"
> >> From rule 2139: "The Registrar's weekly report
> >  includes"
> >
> > The phrase "weekly report" appears 16 times in the rules. A report should
> > be construed as a single document, not as a weekly list of spread-out
> > duties.
>
> I stand extremely corrected.
>
> -o
>
>


-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Owen Jacobson]

> On Nov 7, 2017, at 1:56 AM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> 
>>> The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a convenience
> for the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention in
> the last couple of years, not a >>matter of the rules.
> 
> Uh this is a bit of alternative facts, o.
> 
>> From rule 2162 "That officer's (weekly, if not specified otherwise)report
>  includes the value of each
> instance of that switch  whose
> value is not its default value;"
>> From rule 2139: "The Registrar's weekly report
>  includes"
> 
> The phrase "weekly report" appears 16 times in the rules. A report should
> be construed as a single document, not as a weekly list of spread-out
> duties.

I stand extremely corrected.

-o



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[VJ Rada]

>>The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a convenience
for the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention in
the last couple of years, not a >>matter of the rules.

Uh this is a bit of alternative facts, o.

>From rule 2162 "That officer's (weekly, if not specified otherwise)report
 includes the value of each
instance of that switch  whose
value is not its default value;"
>From rule 2139: "The Registrar's weekly report
 includes"

The phrase "weekly report" appears 16 times in the rules. A report should
be construed as a single document, not as a weekly list of spread-out
duties.

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:

> Some gratuity:
>
> > On Nov 4, 2017, at 6:06 PM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> >
> > I AP CFJ the following: The below document claiming to be the
> Registrar's Weekly Report was not a report.
> >
> > Arguments: The Registrar is required to track Emotion switches (2514)..
> E didn’t.
>
> The idea of “a report” as a single, complete, and self-contained document
> appears nowhere in the rules. It is permissible, as far as I can tell, for
> an officer to separately report each family of reportable facts, so long as
> the results were unambiguous and correct.
>
> The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a convenience
> for the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention in
> the last couple of years, not a matter of the rules. Failing to report the
> values of emotion switches does breach a rule - but it doesn’t invalidate a
> report which is missing that information.
>
> -o
>
>


-- 
>From V.J. Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Owen Jacobson]

Some gratuity:

> On Nov 4, 2017, at 6:06 PM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> 
> I AP CFJ the following: The below document claiming to be the Registrar's 
> Weekly Report was not a report.
> 
> Arguments: The Registrar is required to track Emotion switches (2514).. E 
> didn’t.

The idea of “a report” as a single, complete, and self-contained document 
appears nowhere in the rules. It is permissible, as far as I can tell, for an 
officer to separately report each family of reportable facts, so long as the 
results were unambiguous and correct.

The idea of a single “weekly report” or “monthly report" is a convenience for 
the officer and a modern expectation overlaid by gameplay convention in the 
last couple of years, not a matter of the rules. Failing to report the values 
of emotion switches does breach a rule - but it doesn’t invalidate a report 
which is missing that information.

-o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

So, I have checked the archives on my computer and I believe that is
accurate.

On 11/05/2017 02:03 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 14:01 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>  > wrote:
>
> ATMunn and nichdel were joyous. o and VJ Rada were not because they
> changed their mood not their emotion. I publish the below addition
> as a
> revision:
> ATMunn - Joyous
> nichdel- Joyous
>
>
> That's a fair point re: mood. Have you actually gone through archives
> to make sure you get all the rest of them, though? Those were just
> what I got from a cursory search. 

-- 

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alexis Hunt]

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 14:01 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ATMunn and nichdel were joyous. o and VJ Rada were not because they
> changed their mood not their emotion. I publish the below addition as a
> revision:
> ATMunn - Joyous
> nichdel- Joyous
>

That's a fair point re: mood. Have you actually gone through archives to
make sure you get all the rest of them, though? Those were just what I got
from a cursory search.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alexis Hunt]

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 06:38 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Denied, per 2514 Indifferent is the default, and no player held a
> different emotion, and I only need to report nondefault values.
>

CoE again: No, they definitely held nondefault values.

https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg30153.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg29978.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg30314.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg30316.html

I flip my Emotion to Melancholy, as a result of others' joyousness going
unacknowledged.

-Alexis

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alex Smith]

On Sun, 2017-11-05 at 06:39 -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Denied, per 2514 Indifferent is the default, and no player held a
> different emotion, and I only need to report nondefault values.

See rule 2379. That was added specifially as a consequence of me trying
to use an argument like that.

-- 
ais523

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Kerim Aydin]

You still need to report empty lists see rule 2379.

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Denied, per 2514 Indifferent is the default, and no player held a
> different emotion, and I only need to report nondefault values.
> 
> On 11/04/2017 06:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > Also: CoE this report has no emotion switches.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:06 AM, VJ Rada  > > wrote:
> >
> > I AP CFJ the following: The below document claiming to be the
> > Registrar's Weekly Report was not a report.
> >
> > Arguments: The Registrar is required to track Emotion switches
> > (2514).. E didn't.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >  > > wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> >    Registrar's Weekly Report
> > 
> > 
> >
> > (all times UTC)
> >
> > Date of last report: 22 Oct 2017
> > Date of this report: 29 Oct 2017
> >
> > Recent events:
> >
> >
> > Players (19) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
> >
> >     Player  
> > Contact Registered
> >     --  
> > --- --
> >     Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com
> >    13 Sep 16
> >     Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com
> >    27 Oct 07
> >     o    owen at grimoire.ca
> >  12 Jul 16
> >     天火狐    draconicdarkness at gmail.com
> >    06 Nov 16
> >     Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com
> >     15 Apr 17
> >     P. Scholasticus [2]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com
> > [3] 16 Apr 17
> >     Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com
> >   15 May 17
> >     Ienpw III    james.m.beirne at gmail.com
> >  21 May 17
> >     omd  comexk at gmail.com
> >  [4] 03 Feb 11
> >     Bayushi  thelas.staloras at gmail.com
> >     29 Jun 17
> >     nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com
> >     29 Jun 17
> >     G.   kerim at u.washington.edu
> >    25 Aug 17
> >     Cuddle Beam  cuddlebeam at gmail.com
> >  25 Aug 17
> >     V.J. Rada    vijarada at gmail.com
> >    05 Sep 17
> >     ATMunn   iamingodsarmy at gmail.com
> >   21 Sep 17
> >     ProofTechnique   jhenahan at me.com
> >   23 Sep 17
> >     Trigon   reuben.staley at gmail.com
> >   24 Sep 17
> >     Alexis   alercah at gmail.com
> >     27 Sep 17
> >     Telnaior jdga at iinet.net.au
> >     20 Oct 17
> >
> >
> > [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk 
> > [2] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> > [3] officially, but technically equivalent
> > p.scribonius.scholasticus at
> > googlemail.com 
> > [4] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at
> > gmail.com 
> >
> > Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
> >
> >     Type Location  Typical use
> >       ---
> >     Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org
> >   official reports
> >     Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org
> >   other business
> >     Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.org
> >     discussion
> >     Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic
> >    discussion
> >     Public   agora at listserver.tue.nl
> >     backup
> >
> > Writs of FAGE (Rule 1789)
> 

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

Denied, per 2514 Indifferent is the default, and no player held a
different emotion, and I only need to report nondefault values.

On 11/04/2017 06:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Also: CoE this report has no emotion switches.
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:06 AM, VJ Rada  > wrote:
>
> I AP CFJ the following: The below document claiming to be the
> Registrar's Weekly Report was not a report.
>
> Arguments: The Registrar is required to track Emotion switches
> (2514).. E didn't.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>  > wrote:
>
> 
> 
>    Registrar's Weekly Report
> 
> 
>
> (all times UTC)
>
> Date of last report: 22 Oct 2017
> Date of this report: 29 Oct 2017
>
> Recent events:
>
>
> Players (19) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
>
>     Player  
> Contact Registered
>     --  
> --- --
>     Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com
>    13 Sep 16
>     Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com
>    27 Oct 07
>     o    owen at grimoire.ca
>  12 Jul 16
>     天火狐    draconicdarkness at gmail.com
>    06 Nov 16
>     Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com
>     15 Apr 17
>     P. Scholasticus [2]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com
> [3] 16 Apr 17
>     Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com
>   15 May 17
>     Ienpw III    james.m.beirne at gmail.com
>  21 May 17
>     omd  comexk at gmail.com
>  [4] 03 Feb 11
>     Bayushi  thelas.staloras at gmail.com
>     29 Jun 17
>     nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com
>     29 Jun 17
>     G.   kerim at u.washington.edu
>    25 Aug 17
>     Cuddle Beam  cuddlebeam at gmail.com
>  25 Aug 17
>     V.J. Rada    vijarada at gmail.com
>    05 Sep 17
>     ATMunn   iamingodsarmy at gmail.com
>   21 Sep 17
>     ProofTechnique   jhenahan at me.com
>   23 Sep 17
>     Trigon   reuben.staley at gmail.com
>   24 Sep 17
>     Alexis   alercah at gmail.com
>     27 Sep 17
>     Telnaior jdga at iinet.net.au
>     20 Oct 17
>
>
> [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk 
> [2] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> [3] officially, but technically equivalent
> p.scribonius.scholasticus at
> googlemail.com 
> [4] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at
> gmail.com 
>
> Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
>
>     Type Location  Typical use
>       ---
>     Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org
>   official reports
>     Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org
>   other business
>     Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.org
>     discussion
>     Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic
>    discussion
>     Public   agora at listserver.tue.nl
>     backup
>
> Writs of FAGE (Rule 1789)
>     Player    Date
>     --    
>     Kelly 17 Sep 95
>     Andre 13 Feb 99
>     BobTHJ    16 Jan 08
>     P1 5 Nov 08
>     P2 5 Nov 08
>     P3 6 Nov 

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report and Addenda

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

It was not intended as such and it was rather intended as a description of my 
own behavior.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Sep 4, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Alex Smith  wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 17:33 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>> STUPIDITY: I CoE that the deregistrations weren’t processed.
> 
> The way this is worded makes me think that a stupidity is a type of
> game action.
> 
> --
> ais523



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report and Addenda

[Alex Smith]

On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 17:33 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> STUPIDITY: I CoE that the deregistrations weren’t processed.

The way this is worded makes me think that a stupidity is a type of
game action.

-- 
ais523

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

Accepted,

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Aug 28, 2017, at 6:46 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:
> 
> COE: this report omits the value of the Floating Value switch, required by 
> rule 2139 (“The Registrar”) and rule 2497 (“Floating Value”).
> 
> -o
> 
>> On Aug 27, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Revised:
>> 
>> Registrar's Weekly Report
>> 
>> 
>> (all times UTC)
>> 
>> Date of last report: 20 Aug 2017
>> Date of this report: 27 Aug 2017
>> 
>> Recent events:
>> 
>> 
>> Players (16) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
>> 
>>  Player   Contact Registered
>>  --   --- --
>>  ais523   callforjudgement at yahoo.co.uk [1] 20 Mar 11
>>  Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com   13 Sep 16
>>  Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com   27 Oct 07
>>  oowen at grimoire.ca 12 Jul 16
>>  Sprocklemsprocklem at gmail.com  19 Oct 13
>>  天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com   06 Nov 16
>>  Zachary Watterson [2]tannerswett at gmail.com26 Mar 17
>>  Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com15 Apr 17
>>  P. Scholasticus [3]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com[4] 16 Apr 17
>>  tmanthe2nd   trstnbrdwg0 at gmail.com13 May 17
>>  Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com  15 May 17
>>  Ienpw IIIjames.m.beirne at gmail.com 21 May 17
>>  Veggiekeks   martinjroensch at gmail.com 25 May 17
>>  omd  comexk at gmail.com [5] 03 Feb 11
>>  grok grokagora at gmail.com  24 Jul 17
>>  Bayushi  thelas.staloras at gmail.com29 Jun 17
>>  nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com29 Jun 17
>>  babelian kumarraja.ajay at gmail.com 29 Jul 17
>>  G.   kerim at u.washington.edu   25 Aug 17
>>  Cuddle Beam  cuddlebeam at gmail.com 25 Aug 17
>> 
>> [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk
>> [2] also known as Gumball
>> [3] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> [4] officially, but technically equivalent p.scribonius.scholasticus at 
>> googlemail.com
>> [5] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at gmail.com
>> 
>> Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
>> 
>>  Type Location  Typical use
>>    ---
>>  Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org  official reports
>>  Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org  other business
>>  Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.orgdiscussion
>>  Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic   discussion
>>  Public   agora at listserver.tue.nlbackup
>> 
>>  Subscribe or unsubscribe from main lists:
>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
>> 
>>  Subscribe or unsubscribe from tue.nl backup list:
>> http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
>> 
>>  The IRC channel does not require subscription; set your IRC client to
>>  server irc.freenode.net, port 6667, channel ##nomic, and whatever
>>  nickname you like.
>> 
>> Other rules pertaining to this office
>> -
>> Rule 2139 (The Registrar)
>> Rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus)
>> 
>> Watchers (4)
>> 
>>  The list of Watchers is not governed by the rules, but is
>>  traditionally maintained in the Registrar's Report.  If you'd like to
>>  be listed as a Watcher or removed from the list, feel free to email
>>  the fora or the Registrar directly.
>> 
>>  Watchers confirmed as of May 2017:
>> 
>>  Nickname  Contact
>>    ---
>>  Ørjan oerjan at nvg.ntnu.no
>> 
>>  Watchers confirmed as of May 2013:
>> 
>>  Nickname  Contact
>>    ---
>>  Dave  davidnicol at gmail.com
>>  Phlogistique  noe.rubinstein at gmail.com
>>  Steve zardoz37 at gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 27, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> CoE: Cuddlebeam and G. are absent.
>>> 
>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Aug 27, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
  wrote:
 
 

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Aris Merchant]

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>>  * Nonempty list A, [missing: nonempty list B]
>>  * Nonempty list A, [missing: empty list B, statement that list B is
>>empty]
>>  * Nonempty list A, empty list B, [missing: statement that list B is
>>empty]
>>
>> I can't see any reason why list B wouldn't self-ratify in the third
>> case here. The problem is, there's no way from the text of the email to
>> distinguish it from the second, as they're both textually exactly the
>> same.
>
> Actually, we're looking in the wrong place:  look at the part of the Switches
> rule that defines what actually self-ratifies:
>
>  That officer's (weekly, if not specified
>   otherwise) report includes the value of each instance of that
>   switch whose value is not its default value; a public
>   document purporting to be this portion of that officer's
>   report is self-ratifying, and implies that other instances
>   are at their default value.
>
> In other words, if there's no portion of the report purporting to be that
> particular section, the switches don't ratify.

This also works pretty nicely.

-Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Aris Merchant]

That seems likely. Also, if it ratified, I don't think it would do anything.

Rule 1551:

"A public document is part (possibly all) of a public message.

When a public document is ratified, rules to the contrary
notwithstanding, the gamestate is modified to what it would be if, at
the time the ratified document was published, the gamestate had been
minimally modified to make the ratified document as true and accurate
as possible. Such a modification cannot add inconsistencies between
the gamestate and the rules, and it cannot include rule changes unless
the ratified document explicitly and unambiguously recites either the
changes or the resulting properties of the rule(s). If no such
modification is possible, or multiple substantially distinct possible
modifications would be equally appropriate, the ratification fails."

Rule 478:
"A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent to all
players and containing a clear designation of intent to be public. A
rule can also designate that a part of one public message is
considered a public message in its own right. A person "publishes" or
"announces" something by sending a public message."

Rule 2162:

"Optionally, exactly one office whose holder tracks instances of that
switch. That officer's (weekly, if not specified otherwise) report
includes the value of each instance of that switch whose value is not
its default value; a public document purporting to be this portion of
that officer's report is self-ratifying, and implies that other
instances are at their default value."


The interesting thing is that rule 1551 seems to require the data to
be in the message itself. Saying that a person is not required to
report something in it's default state, combined with it not being in
the report, doesn't actually make the report say that it isn't in its
default state. For one thing, the fact isn't in the text. Another
problem is that it could always be in a separate report document, in a
separate message. Given that the fact isn't in the document,
(self-)ratifying the document doesn't make it true. You can't
meaningfully ratify a null statement.

-Aris

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>>  * Nonempty list A, [missing: nonempty list B]
>>  * Nonempty list A, [missing: empty list B, statement that list B is
>>empty]
>>  * Nonempty list A, empty list B, [missing: statement that list B is
>>empty]
>>
>> I can't see any reason why list B wouldn't self-ratify in the third
>> case here. The problem is, there's no way from the text of the email to
>> distinguish it from the second, as they're both textually exactly the
>> same.
>
> Actually, we're looking in the wrong place:  look at the part of the Switches
> rule that defines what actually self-ratifies:
>
>  That officer's (weekly, if not specified
>   otherwise) report includes the value of each instance of that
>   switch whose value is not its default value; a public
>   document purporting to be this portion of that officer's
>   report is self-ratifying, and implies that other instances
>   are at their default value.
>
> In other words, if there's no portion of the report purporting to be that
> particular section, the switches don't ratify.
>
>
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> In other words, if there's no portion of the report purporting to be
> that particular section, the switches don't ratify.

Oh wow, the "purports to be" protection was mostly AFAIK intended to
save us in places where the report wasn't actually a report (e.g.
because we were mistaken as to who held the office), by causing a non-
report to self-ratify, but it saves us here by working backwards: zero-
length lists aren't purported to be any particular zero-length list
unless they have accompanying text saying what they're meant to be. I
hadn't considered the possibility of a document containing information
without purporting to contain that information, but this is definitely
a case where it's possible.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Kerim Aydin]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>  * Nonempty list A, [missing: nonempty list B]
>  * Nonempty list A, [missing: empty list B, statement that list B is
>empty]
>  * Nonempty list A, empty list B, [missing: statement that list B is
>empty]
> 
> I can't see any reason why list B wouldn't self-ratify in the third
> case here. The problem is, there's no way from the text of the email to
> distinguish it from the second, as they're both textually exactly the
> same.

Actually, we're looking in the wrong place:  look at the part of the Switches 
rule that defines what actually self-ratifies:

 That officer's (weekly, if not specified
  otherwise) report includes the value of each instance of that
  switch whose value is not its default value; a public
  document purporting to be this portion of that officer's
  report is self-ratifying, and implies that other instances
  are at their default value.

In other words, if there's no portion of the report purporting to be that
particular section, the switches don't ratify.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The report must "include the fact that the list is empty".  I think,
> in plain language, this must be something like a sentence "there are no
> non-default values for the X switch."  Otherwise the fact is not "included."

I agree that this is a requirement on the report. What I'm less clear
on is what happens when the requirement is not met. Does it cause the
entire report to not be a report? If not, we have a report that
contains some of the information it's meant to contain, and not other
information.

Say a report is meant to contain list A and list B, but only actually
appears to contain list A. There are two possible sets of requirements
for what the report was meant to contain, based on whether list B is
empty or not:

 * Nonempty list A, nonempty list B
 * Nonempty list A, empty list B, statement that list B is empty

As for what subset of the report was actually posted, only being able
to see list A in the report then gives us three possibilities for what
was present and what was missing:

 * Nonempty list A, [missing: nonempty list B]
 * Nonempty list A, [missing: empty list B, statement that list B is
   empty]
 * Nonempty list A, empty list B, [missing: statement that list B is
   empty]

I can't see any reason why list B wouldn't self-ratify in the third
case here. The problem is, there's no way from the text of the email to
distinguish it from the second, as they're both textually exactly the
same.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Kerim Aydin]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > The Registrar's Report before the one that was CoEd my well have self-
> > > ratified the Floating Value as 0 (it's defined as containing a list of
> > > all Floating Value switches that don't have their default value of 0,
> > > thus given that no such list is present, arguably all Floating Value
> > > switches must be at 0).
> > 
> > I think Rule 2379 may save us from this one:  a report containing nothing
> > is different than no report.
> 
> Each officer has at most one weekly and one monthly report, which can
> each consist of multiple documents.
> 
> Note that Agoran usage on this subject has been very sloppy, especially
> recently. It used to be that "a report" wasn't a specific thing rules-
> wise and defining a document as part of a report simply defined a
> frequency for publishing it, but nowadays the rules seem to assume that
> a report is a thing in its own right.

The report must "include the fact that the list is empty".  I think, in
plain language, this must be something like a sentence "there are no
non-default values for the X switch."  Otherwise the fact is not "included."

Saying that including no reference to the list is the same as reporting
that the list is empty ignores both the plain meaning and the intent of 
the rule, IMO.

(the original intent being for the officer to report "there's nothing to
report for this list" if there's nothing to report).

Relevant:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bz_FQA8jjk

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > The Registrar's Report before the one that was CoEd my well have self-
> > ratified the Floating Value as 0 (it's defined as containing a list of
> > all Floating Value switches that don't have their default value of 0,
> > thus given that no such list is present, arguably all Floating Value
> > switches must be at 0).
> 
> I think Rule 2379 may save us from this one:  a report containing nothing
> is different than no report.

Each officer has at most one weekly and one monthly report, which can
each consist of multiple documents.

Note that Agoran usage on this subject has been very sloppy, especially
recently. It used to be that "a report" wasn't a specific thing rules-
wise and defining a document as part of a report simply defined a
frequency for publishing it, but nowadays the rules seem to assume that
a report is a thing in its own right.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Kerim Aydin]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> The Registrar's Report before the one that was CoEd my well have self-
> ratified the Floating Value as 0 (it's defined as containing a list of
> all Floating Value switches that don't have their default value of 0,
> thus given that no such list is present, arguably all Floating Value
> switches must be at 0).

I think Rule 2379 may save us from this one:  a report containing nothing
is different than no report.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Aris Merchant]

I favor any CFJ(s) coming out of this.

-Aris

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:44 PM Alex Smith  wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 15:46 -0700, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > COE: this report omits the value of the Floating Value switch,
> > required by rule 2139 (“The Registrar”) and rule 2497 (“Floating
> > Value”).
>
> I was busy writing up a CFJ about whether this was a "stop the
> gamestate ratifying" sort of COE that had legal effect (mostly on the
> basis that a COE has to identify an error in a self-ratifying document,
> whereas this is claiming that a self-ratifying document doesn't exist).
>
> However, I came across a much bigger problem: the rule states that
> Floating Value is a switch, but not which entities have such a switch
> (it's missing the word "singleton"). "The Floating Value" may well be
> meaningless. Or perhaps there's a legal fiction that it's a value that
> can be set, despite also being a switch. (Something Agora's rules have
> always been very fuzzy on is whether a single imaginary gamestate
> entity can be multiple types of entity at the same time; for example,
> is it possible for the text of a rule to simultaneously be a proposal?
> I don't think there's any mechanism that could attempt to create such a
> gamestate at the moment, other than outpowering rule 105, but the
> restrictions in the rules are against creating such a state, and are
> silent on whether such a state can exist.) Or perhaps the rules imply
> there's exactly one such switch, even though we can't tell which entity
> it belongs to.
>
> The Registrar's Report before the one that was CoEd my well have self-
> ratified the Floating Value as 0 (it's defined as containing a list of
> all Floating Value switches that don't have their default value of 0,
> thus given that no such list is present, arguably all Floating Value
> switches must be at 0). In this case, many Shiny awards may have failed
> to do anything useful (although I think it'd probably be in the best
> interests of the game to let the Secretary's report self-ratify
> anyway...).
>
> It's possible that Rule 2379 is a counterargument to this, though; but
> perhaps not. In general, publishing a zero-length document is not an
> observable action, so how can you tell whether it happened or not? Rule
> 2379 attempts to get around the problem by requiring a report as to the
> existence of the zero-length document, but unfortunately that part of
> the report is not part of the self-ratifying document itself. (It
> wasn't constructed in an attempt to prevent zero-length documents self-
> ratifying, something that I'm not sure anyone has thought about before,
> but as a method of shutting down a rather creative argument I once used
> in an attempt to claim pay for a report I hadn't been posting but which
> didn't contain any non-default information at the time.)
>
> --
> ais523
>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 15:46 -0700, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> COE: this report omits the value of the Floating Value switch,
> required by rule 2139 (“The Registrar”) and rule 2497 (“Floating
> Value”).

I was busy writing up a CFJ about whether this was a "stop the
gamestate ratifying" sort of COE that had legal effect (mostly on the
basis that a COE has to identify an error in a self-ratifying document,
whereas this is claiming that a self-ratifying document doesn't exist).

However, I came across a much bigger problem: the rule states that
Floating Value is a switch, but not which entities have such a switch
(it's missing the word "singleton"). "The Floating Value" may well be
meaningless. Or perhaps there's a legal fiction that it's a value that
can be set, despite also being a switch. (Something Agora's rules have
always been very fuzzy on is whether a single imaginary gamestate
entity can be multiple types of entity at the same time; for example,
is it possible for the text of a rule to simultaneously be a proposal?
I don't think there's any mechanism that could attempt to create such a
gamestate at the moment, other than outpowering rule 105, but the
restrictions in the rules are against creating such a state, and are
silent on whether such a state can exist.) Or perhaps the rules imply
there's exactly one such switch, even though we can't tell which entity
it belongs to.

The Registrar's Report before the one that was CoEd my well have self-
ratified the Floating Value as 0 (it's defined as containing a list of
all Floating Value switches that don't have their default value of 0,
thus given that no such list is present, arguably all Floating Value
switches must be at 0). In this case, many Shiny awards may have failed
to do anything useful (although I think it'd probably be in the best
interests of the game to let the Secretary's report self-ratify
anyway...).

It's possible that Rule 2379 is a counterargument to this, though; but
perhaps not. In general, publishing a zero-length document is not an
observable action, so how can you tell whether it happened or not? Rule
2379 attempts to get around the problem by requiring a report as to the
existence of the zero-length document, but unfortunately that part of
the report is not part of the self-ratifying document itself. (It
wasn't constructed in an attempt to prevent zero-length documents self-
ratifying, something that I'm not sure anyone has thought about before,
but as a method of shutting down a rather creative argument I once used
in an attempt to claim pay for a report I hadn't been posting but which
didn't contain any non-default information at the time.)

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Gaelan Steele]

This is invalid; apologies must be of at least 200 words 
(https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/#Rule2427 
)

Gaelan
> On Aug 20, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
>  wrote:
> 
> I apologies for all wrongs or other cartable offenses I may have committed in 
> the execution of my offices, for which I have been issued a card.
> 
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 16, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 13, 2017, at 11:42 PM, Aris Merchant 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:39 PM Alex Smith  wrote:
 
 On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:15 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> CoE grok is a player
 
 If only we could set up a standing order for this or something.
 The Referee should perhaps at least start giving out cards; a mistake
 in a report is excusable, making it that many times in a row isn't.
 
 --
 ais523
>>> 
>>> I point my finger at P.S.S. for violations of Rule 2143, which states
>>> that: "A person SHALL NOT publish information that is inaccurate or
>>> misleading while performing an official duty, or within a document
>>> purporting to be part of any person or office's weekly or monthly
>>> report." I recommend a sentence of yellow card. These errors, while
>>> independently insignificant, together have a "a significant, though
>>> small, impact on gameplay" (Rule 2427), if nothing else because
>>> they're an annoying distraction.
>> 
>> In light of P.S.S.’ own admission
>> 
>> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:56 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> I accept this and publish the below corrected version. I apologize for this 
>>> error, but I have finally figured out how it has occurred. It seems that 
>>> when I made previous corrections, I failed to add them to the standing 
>>> file. This should not happen again. However, I still believe that I may be 
>>> deserving of a card.
>> 
>> and the comprehensive argument presented by Aris, I issue Publius Scribonius 
>> Scholasticus a Yellow Card by Summary Judgement for violating Rule 2143. 
>> However, as it’s clear that P.S.S. has already taken steps to rectify the 
>> issue, I impose no specific set of words to be included in eir apology, 
>> should e choose to apologize.
>> 
>> -o
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Alex Smith]

On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:15 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> CoE grok is a player

If only we could set up a standing order for this or something.
The Referee should perhaps at least start giving out cards; a mistake
in a report is excusable, making it that many times in a row isn't.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

I believe I already did so.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On May 28, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Nicholas Evans  wrote:
> 
> You should correct the player count while you're at it.
> 
> On May 28, 2017 7:30 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" 
>  wrote:
> Accepted, I thought I included that.
> 
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> > On May 28, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Martin Rönsch  wrote:
> >
> > Call of Error: I am also a player
> >
> > Veggiekeks
> >
> > Am 28.05.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
> >> I hereby act as registrar to publish the below weekly report.
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >>Registrar's Weekly Report
> >> 
> >>
> >> (all times UTC)
> >>
> >> Date of last report: 18 May 2017
> >> Date of this report: 28 May 2017
> >>
> >> Recent events:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Players (17) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
> >>
> >> Player   Contact Registered
> >> --   --- --
> >> ais523   callforjudgement at yahoo.co.uk [1] 20 Mar 11
> >> aranea   aranea at aixea.de  31 Aug 14
> >> Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com   13 Sep 16
> >> Charles  charles.w.walker at gmail.com   11 Jul 16
> >> Henrihenrib736 at gmail.com  07 May 13
> >> Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com   27 Oct 07
> >> nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com01 Dec 15
> >> oowen at grimoire.ca 12 Jul 16
> >> omd  comexk at gmail.com [2] 03 Feb 11
> >> Sci_Guy12jwc.science at gmail.com14 Jul 16
> >> Sprocklemsprocklem at gmail.com  19 Oct 13
> >> Tekneek  tekgora at theglycerintekneek.com   12 Jun 15
> >> Warrigal, the [3]tannerswett at gmail.com25 Apr 15
> >> Yallyaarongoldfein at gmail.com  11 Jul 16
> >> 天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com   06 Nov 16
> >> Zachary Watterson [4]tannerswett at gmail.com26 Mar 17
> >> Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com15 Apr 17
> >> P. Scholasticus [5]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com[6] 16 Apr 17
> >> tmanthe2nd   trstnbrdwg0 at gmail.com13 May 17
> >> Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com  15 May 17
> >> grok grokagora at gmail.com  18 May 17
> >> Cuddlebeam   cuddlebeam at googlemail.com20 May 17
> >> Ienpw IIIjames.m.beirne at gmail.com 21 May 17
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk
> >> [2] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at gmail.com
> >> [3] previously Alfonso Machiavelli, the Warrigal
> >> [4] also known as Gumball
> >> [5] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> [6] officially, but technically equivalent p.scribonius.scholasticus at 
> >> googlemail.com
> >>
> >> Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
> >>
> >> Type Location  Typical use
> >>   ---
> >> Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org  official reports
> >> Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org  other business
> >> Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.orgdiscussion
> >> Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic   discussion
> >> Public   agora at listserver.tue.nlbackup
> >>
> >> Subscribe or unsubscribe from main lists:
> >> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
> >>
> >> Subscribe or unsubscribe from tue.nl backup list:
> >> http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
> >>
> >> The IRC channel does not require subscription; set your IRC client to
> >> server irc.freenode.net, port 6667, channel ##nomic, and whatever
> >> nickname you like.
> >>
> >> Other rules pertaining to this office
> >> -
> >> Rule 2139 (The Registrar)
> >> Rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus)
> >>
> >> Watchers (4)
> >>
> >> The list of Watchers is not governed by the rules, but is
> >> traditionally maintained in the Registrar's Report.  If you'd like to
> >> be listed as a Watcher or removed from the list, feel free to email
> >> the fora or the Registrar directly.
> >>
> >> Watchers confirmed as of Sep 2016:
> >>
> >> Nickname

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Nicholas Evans]

You should correct the player count while you're at it.

On May 28, 2017 7:30 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Accepted, I thought I included that.
> 
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Martin Rönsch 
> wrote:
> >
> > Call of Error: I am also a player
> >
> > Veggiekeks
> >
> > Am 28.05.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
> >> I hereby act as registrar to publish the below weekly report.
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> 
> >>Registrar's Weekly Report
> >> 
> 
> >>
> >> (all times UTC)
> >>
> >> Date of last report: 18 May 2017
> >> Date of this report: 28 May 2017
> >>
> >> Recent events:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Players (17) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
> >>
> >> Player   Contact
>  Registered
> >> --   ---
>  --
> >> ais523   callforjudgement at yahoo.co.uk [1] 20
> Mar 11
> >> aranea   aranea at aixea.de  31
> Aug 14
> >> Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com   13
> Sep 16
> >> Charles  charles.w.walker at gmail.com   11
> Jul 16
> >> Henrihenrib736 at gmail.com  07
> May 13
> >> Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com   27
> Oct 07
> >> nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com01
> Dec 15
> >> oowen at grimoire.ca 12
> Jul 16
> >> omd  comexk at gmail.com [2] 03
> Feb 11
> >> Sci_Guy12jwc.science at gmail.com14
> Jul 16
> >> Sprocklemsprocklem at gmail.com  19
> Oct 13
> >> Tekneek  tekgora at theglycerintekneek.com   12
> Jun 15
> >> Warrigal, the [3]tannerswett at gmail.com25
> Apr 15
> >> Yallyaarongoldfein at gmail.com  11
> Jul 16
> >> 天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com   06 Nov
> 16
> >> Zachary Watterson [4]tannerswett at gmail.com26
> Mar 17
> >> Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com15
> Apr 17
> >> P. Scholasticus [5]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com[6] 16
> Apr 17
> >> tmanthe2nd   trstnbrdwg0 at gmail.com13
> May 17
> >> Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com  15
> May 17
> >> grok grokagora at gmail.com  18
> May 17
> >> Cuddlebeam   cuddlebeam at googlemail.com20
> May 17
> >> Ienpw IIIjames.m.beirne at gmail.com 21
> May 17
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk
> >> [2] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at gmail.com
> >> [3] previously Alfonso Machiavelli, the Warrigal
> >> [4] also known as Gumball
> >> [5] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> [6] officially, but technically equivalent p.scribonius.scholasticus at
> googlemail.com
> >>
> >> Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
> >>
> >> Type Location  Typical use
> >>   ---
> >> Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org  official reports
> >> Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org  other business
> >> Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.orgdiscussion
> >> Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic   discussion
> >> Public   agora at listserver.tue.nlbackup
> >>
> >> Subscribe or unsubscribe from main lists:
> >> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
> >>
> >> Subscribe or unsubscribe from tue.nl backup list:
> >> http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
> >>
> >> The IRC channel does not require subscription; set your IRC client
> to
> >> server irc.freenode.net, port 6667, channel ##nomic, and whatever
> >> nickname you like.
> >>
> >> Other rules pertaining to this office
> >> -
> >> Rule 2139 (The Registrar)
> >> Rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus)
> >>
> >> Watchers (4)
> >>
> >> The list of Watchers is not governed by the rules, but is
> >> traditionally maintained in the Registrar's Report.  If you'd like
> to
> >> be listed as a Watcher or removed from the list, feel free to email
> >> the fora or the Registrar directly.
> >>
> >> Watchers confirmed as of Sep 2016:
> >>
> >> Nickname  Contact
> >>   ---
> >> Ørjan oerjan at nvg.ntnu.no
> >>
> >> Watchers confirmed as of May 2013:
> >>
> >> Nickname  Contact
> >>   

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

Accepted, I thought I included that.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On May 28, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Martin Rönsch  wrote:
> 
> Call of Error: I am also a player
> 
> Veggiekeks
> 
> Am 28.05.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>> I hereby act as registrar to publish the below weekly report.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>Registrar's Weekly Report
>> 
>> 
>> (all times UTC)
>> 
>> Date of last report: 18 May 2017
>> Date of this report: 28 May 2017
>> 
>> Recent events:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Players (17) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
>> 
>> Player   Contact Registered
>> --   --- --
>> ais523   callforjudgement at yahoo.co.uk [1] 20 Mar 11
>> aranea   aranea at aixea.de  31 Aug 14
>> Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com   13 Sep 16
>> Charles  charles.w.walker at gmail.com   11 Jul 16
>> Henrihenrib736 at gmail.com  07 May 13
>> Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com   27 Oct 07
>> nichdel  nichdel at gmail.com01 Dec 15
>> oowen at grimoire.ca 12 Jul 16
>> omd  comexk at gmail.com [2] 03 Feb 11
>> Sci_Guy12jwc.science at gmail.com14 Jul 16
>> Sprocklemsprocklem at gmail.com  19 Oct 13
>> Tekneek  tekgora at theglycerintekneek.com   12 Jun 15
>> Warrigal, the [3]tannerswett at gmail.com25 Apr 15
>> Yallyaarongoldfein at gmail.com  11 Jul 16
>> 天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com   06 Nov 16
>> Zachary Watterson [4]tannerswett at gmail.com26 Mar 17
>> Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com15 Apr 17
>> P. Scholasticus [5]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com[6] 16 Apr 17
>> tmanthe2nd   trstnbrdwg0 at gmail.com13 May 17
>> Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com  15 May 17
>> grok grokagora at gmail.com  18 May 17
>> Cuddlebeam   cuddlebeam at googlemail.com20 May 17
>> Ienpw IIIjames.m.beirne at gmail.com 21 May 17
>> 
>> 
>> [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk
>> [2] officially, but technically equivalent c.ome.xk at gmail.com
>> [3] previously Alfonso Machiavelli, the Warrigal
>> [4] also known as Gumball
>> [5] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> [6] officially, but technically equivalent p.scribonius.scholasticus at 
>> googlemail.com
>> 
>> Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
>> 
>> Type Location  Typical use
>>   ---
>> Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org  official reports
>> Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org  other business
>> Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.orgdiscussion
>> Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic   discussion
>> Public   agora at listserver.tue.nlbackup
>> 
>> Subscribe or unsubscribe from main lists:
>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
>> 
>> Subscribe or unsubscribe from tue.nl backup list:
>> http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
>> 
>> The IRC channel does not require subscription; set your IRC client to
>> server irc.freenode.net, port 6667, channel ##nomic, and whatever
>> nickname you like.
>> 
>> Other rules pertaining to this office
>> -
>> Rule 2139 (The Registrar)
>> Rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus)
>> 
>> Watchers (4)
>> 
>> The list of Watchers is not governed by the rules, but is
>> traditionally maintained in the Registrar's Report.  If you'd like to
>> be listed as a Watcher or removed from the list, feel free to email
>> the fora or the Registrar directly.
>> 
>> Watchers confirmed as of Sep 2016:
>> 
>> Nickname  Contact
>>   ---
>> Ørjan oerjan at nvg.ntnu.no
>> 
>> Watchers confirmed as of May 2013:
>> 
>> Nickname  Contact
>>   ---
>> Dave  davidnicol at gmail.com
>> Phlogistique  noe.rubinstein at gmail.com
>> Steve zardoz37 at gmail.com
>> 
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>