Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-04 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
NttPF. I'm not _trying_ to catch you out, I promise... -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 4, 2018 5:24 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > Oh come on. That's cruel. > > I withdraw my proposal entitled "Revamping movement v3.1" if possible. > > I submit and pend the following proposal. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-04 Thread Reuben Staley
Oh come on. That's cruel. I withdraw my proposal entitled "Revamping movement v3.1" if possible. I submit and pend the following proposal. - Title: Revamping movement v3.2 AI: 1 Author: Trigon Co-authors: twg, Aris, G., Corona Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-04 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Sorry, only just noticed this - you changed "force-feed" to "feed" in one place but missed the other occurrence. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 4, 2018 5:16 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > I feel I've given ample time to submit notes on this version. > > I withdraw my proposal

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-03 Thread Reuben Staley
> G. I believe this is implied by R2509, but I have added a provision in the case that it's not. > Aris That is a valid concern. The reason it is the way it is now is simply that I thought it was funny to include excessively ridiculous words. Nevertheless, I have changed it in the below

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-03 Thread Aris Merchant
With G.'s suggestion, this looks pretty great content-wise. I would request that you change "force-feed" to "feed", though, because the real world contexts where the former occurs are somewhat upsetting. -Aris On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:10 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > This reads really clearly

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
This reads really clearly and I like it this way around. Minor edit: capitalize the CAN and add to that sentence "if it would not reduce eir EP below 0"? (Not sure if it's implied anyway, better safe than sorry?) On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > I believe this institutes a clear

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-01 Thread Reuben Staley
I believe this institutes a clear cause-and-effect. Please notify me if it doesn't, G.. Title: Revamping movement v3 AI: 1 Author: Trigon Co-authors: Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text with: Energy Points (abbreviated EP) is an untracked natural player

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-01 Thread Corona
I'd prefer the shorter version ("I move to (x, y)), as that decreases the potential for mistakes by automatically using the correct amount of resources. On Wednesday, August 1, 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > In adding the switch layer you need to put in a "by announcement" somewhere > as it's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
In adding the switch layer you need to put in a "by announcement" somewhere as it's no longer implied as it is with payments/fees. It's also a but unclear on cause and effect - do people decrease their EP to cause movement, or move and as a result have their EP decrease - This affects

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-07-31 Thread Reuben Staley
I added some more shorthand and made the changes suggested. Somehow I know I've messed up something, though, so I'm not pending it just yet. Title: Revamping movement v2 AI: 1 Author: Trigon Co-authors: Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text with: Energy Points

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-07-31 Thread Aris Merchant
I'm sorry for my lack of clarity. The proposal currently says "Players can destroy one apple to increase eir...". Players is plural, whereas eir is singular, so they do not agree in number. You could change eir to their, but I was suggesting that it might be clearer to make the subject singular.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-07-31 Thread Reuben Staley
Can you explain this? I don't understand what you're saying I should to. On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 18:00 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > A playercan destroy... Eir is singular, and you're really talking about one > player at a time anyway. > > -Aris > > On Tue, Jul 31,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-07-31 Thread Reuben Staley
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 17:20 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Doesn't include G.'s land grants (proposal 8064). > Darn. I kept reminding myself I had to include that in the proposal while writing it up but I just didn't do it. Aaaah, this is why I can't trust myself to immediately pend stuff. Also,

DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-07-31 Thread Aris Merchant
A playercan destroy... Eir is singular, and you're really talking about one player at a time anyway. -Aris On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:16 PM Reuben Staley wrote: > This is something I've been meaning to do for a long time. It's taken > from MALF. I submit and pend the following proposal: > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-07-31 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Doesn't include G.'s land grants (proposal 8064). Also, may I suggest allowing people to destroy apples and corn to increase _any player's_ EP? Makes zombie movement less of a faff. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 31, 2018 11:16 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > This is something