Yeah, I agree it's probably not actually necessary, but I figure more precision
can't be a bad thing, and in the unlikely event that it _does_ actually close a
loophole, we'll be glad of it.
Good to know you're taking care of the Points Installation Act, I'll look
forward to it. :) And
Thanks for the offer! I've written it. I just need to look it over, and
I'll probably publish a draft sometime tomorow (UTC-7:00). After that, I'll
leave a few days for public comment, and then distribute later this week.
Good idea on providing a flat adjustment version of "From each according to
2 matches
Mail list logo