DIS: Re: BUS: Ugh

2017-11-27 Thread VJ Rada
I recalled the cfj allowing me to do this, but obviously that is not successful if this actually worked, so I suggest that somebody else call the same CFJ again. The dependencies this week have been quite intolerable. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >

DIS: Re: BUS: ugh

2010-04-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: I really have no clue what this means; odds are good that I'd just (as vote collector) decide that if there was any complexity at all, I'd just resolve the darn thing as PRESENT due to ambiguity. Wouldn't replacing the vote

DIS: Re: BUS: ugh

2010-04-04 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: Proposal: WTF does this even do? (AI=2, II=1) {{{ Amend Rule 2154 (Election Procedure) by replacing 3) Each eligible voter's voting limit is one. An ordered list of multiple choices constitutes a conditional vote for the first choice if it could

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ugh

2010-04-04 Thread Sean Hunt
On 04/04/2010 11:25 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: I was trying to implement instant runoff voting, e.g. if the votes are 3 for ais523 3 for BobTHJ 2 for comex 1 for (comex, ais523) then the last vote evaluates to ais523. Attempted rewrite: An ordered list of multiple choices is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ugh

2010-04-04 Thread Charles Walker
On 4 April 2010 21:15, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/04/2010 11:25 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: I was trying to implement instant runoff voting, e.g. if the votes are   3 for ais523   3 for BobTHJ   2 for comex   1 for (comex, ais523) then the last vote evaluates to ais523. Attempted