Oh. Ok. I didn't expect it to be remotely controversial, just saw the "error"
and thought I would do something. (shrug emoticon)
-twg
Sent from my mobile
Original Message
On 25 Sep 2019, 18:33, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I object to all of the below intents. This crosses my line from
> "useful style guide" to "overly proscriptive". (and I tend to prefer
> "which").
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, [2019](tel:2019) at 6:20 AM Timon Walshe-Grey
> wrote:
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 107, "Initiating Agoran
>> Decisions", by replacing the following:
>>
>> An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
>> initiate it publishes a valid notice which sets forth the intent
>> to initiate the decision
>>
>> with:
>>
>> An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
>> initiate it publishes a valid notice that sets forth the intent
>> to initiate the decision
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [1607](tel:1607), "Distribution",
>> by replacing the following:
>>
>> The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal which is in the Proposal
>> Pool at any time, by announcement.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal that is in the Proposal
>> Pool at any time, by announcement.
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [1681](tel:1681), "The Logical
>> Rulesets", by replacing the following:
>>
>> The Full Logical Ruleset (FLR) is a format of the ruleset. In this
>> format, rules are assigned to the same category and presented in
>> the same order as in the SLR. The FLR must contain all the
>> information required to be in the SLR, and any historical
>> annotations which the Rulekeepor is required to record.
>>
>> The Rulekeepor SHOULD also include any other information which e
>> feels may be helpful in the use of the ruleset in the FLR.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> The Full Logical Ruleset (FLR) is a format of the ruleset. In this
>> format, rules are assigned to the same category and presented in
>> the same order as in the SLR. The FLR must contain all the
>> information required to be in the SLR, and any historical
>> annotations that the Rulekeepor is required to record.
>>
>> The Rulekeepor SHOULD also include any other information that e
>> feels may be helpful in the use of the ruleset in the FLR.
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [2127](tel:2127), "Conditional
>> Votes", by replacing the following:
>>
>> A conditional vote on an Agoran decision is a vote which indicates
>> a vote based on some condition(s).
>>
>> with:
>>
>> A conditional vote on an Agoran decision is a vote that indicates
>> a vote based on some condition(s).
>>
>> and the following:
>>
>> Any vote which is clearly expressed as a conditional, e.g. "FOR if
>> is true, AGAINST otherwise", is a valid conditional vote that
>> evaluates as specified.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> Any vote that is clearly expressed as a conditional, e.g. "FOR if
>> is true, AGAINST otherwise", is a valid conditional vote that
>> evaluates as specified.
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [2327](tel:2327), "Read the
>> Ruleset Week", by replacing the following:
>>
>> The first Agoran week each year which falls entirely in February
>> is Read the Ruleset Week. Agorans are encouraged to read the
>> ruleset during Read the Ruleset Week.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> The first Agoran week each year that falls entirely in February
>> is Read the Ruleset Week. Agorans are encouraged to read the
>> ruleset during Read the Ruleset Week.
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [2422](tel:2422), "Voting
>> Strength", by replacing the following:
>>
>> When multiple rules set or modify an entity's voting strength on
>> an Agoran decision, it shall be determined by first applying the
>> rule(s) which set it to a specific value
>>
>> with:
>>
>> When multiple rules set or modify an entity's voting strength on
>> an Agoran decision, it shall be determined by first applying the
>> rule(s) that set it to a specific value
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [2472](tel:2472), "Office
>> Incompatibilities", by replacing the following:
>>
>> A player is Overpowered if e holds two offices which are
>> incompatible with each other.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> A player is Overpowered if e holds two offices that are
>> incompatible with each other.
>>
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule [2531](tel:2531), "Referee
>> Accountability", by replacing the following:
>>
>> (1) it attempts to levy a fine on a person for an action or
>> inaction which e (more likely than not) did not commit;
>>
>> (2) it attempts to levy a fine for an action or inaction which
>> is not prohibited by the rules;
>>
>> (3) it attempts to levy a fine with a value that is blatantly
>> and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes the
>> reason for its levy or to the person on whom it is being
>> levied;
>>
>> with:
>>
>> (1) it attempts to levy a fine on a person for an action or
>> inactio
