DIS: Re: BUS: Who's a good girl, then?

2014-02-24 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I transfer an 'i' to Lilly. (This is actually non-controversial; operator ownership isn't limited to players or persons). As a non-player person, I'm sure there's a way I can pillage this operator from Lilly.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Who's a good girl, then?

2014-02-24 Thread Sprocklem
On 14-02-24 01:42 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu mailto:ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I transfer an 'i' to Lilly. (This is actually non-controversial; operator ownership isn't limited to players or persons). As a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Who's a good girl, then?

2014-02-24 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Benjamin Schultz wrote: As a non-player person, I'm sure there's a way I can pillage this operator from Lilly.  Where are the discussions of ships and pillaging?  I didn't find any by searching the SLR. Score, which defines nearness for pillaging, is not defined for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Who's a good girl, then?

2014-02-16 Thread Fool
On 2014-02-14 7:04 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 15:59 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: I transfer an 'i' to Lilly. (This is actually non-controversial; operator ownership isn't limited to players or persons). Isn't it slightly controversial, in that there's currently no proof

DIS: Re: BUS: Who's a good girl, then?

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 15:59 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: I transfer an 'i' to Lilly. (This is actually non-controversial; operator ownership isn't limited to players or persons). Isn't it slightly controversial, in that there's currently no proof generally available to Agorans that Lilly exists