Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

No, never mind, I don't think it does. I can make it work. -Aris On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > If no one objects, I'm going to make it support, object, or resolve, > on the basis that it's a bit easier to write and has a similar

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

If no one objects, I'm going to make it support, object, or resolve, on the basis that it's a bit easier to write and has a similar effect. -Aris On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Actually, on reflection I think zombies are locked out of *all*

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:43 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:27 PM Ørjan Johansen > wrote: > > > I don't think there's anything preventing the Zombie from stating the > > > intent and the master supporting. Which e would have

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

Actually, on reflection I think zombies are locked out of *all* dependent action steps (intent, support, or object). Even if my legal theory doesn't hold water, it's a good nerf in any case so I'd likely vote for that, most things that are really sensitive are locked behind dependent action

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:27 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > I don't think there's anything preventing the Zombie from stating the > > intent and the master supporting. Which e would have had to do anyway, > > since you can only appoint _another_ player to Speaker by this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

Okay, I've had enough of this. Zombies break too much of the ruleset. They most definitely should not be appointing people Speaker. I move we repeal them. -Aris On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:27 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Sun, 29

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote: N I was a second away from using my zombie to appoint myself speaker. Ørjan offered a theory that zombies CANNOT support anything - while it I don't think there's anything preventing the Zombie from

DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

I would be honored to serve as the speaker. Thank you for this opportunity. *frantically looks over rules about the Speaker* On 4/29/2018 2:17 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:31 AM Edward Murphy wrote: Aris wrote: I object strongly, given that e is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > N I was a second away from using my zombie to appoint myself speaker. Ørjan offered a theory that zombies CANNOT support anything - while it hasn't been tested in court, I agree with it because of use of the word "consent" in R2124: > A

DIS: Re: BUS: Woofers and tweeters

N I was a second away from using my zombie to appoint myself speaker. On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:31 AM Edward Murphy wrote: > >> Aris wrote: >> >> > I object strongly, given that