On 1/16/2020 6:42 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 21:39, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> maybe argue that
> we should eliminate actions done other than by announcement
I would like to keep (and in fact use more of) the "Notice" mechanism - I
think it's convenient in
ais523 wrote:
> This strikes me as an almost identical situation to a rule stating that
> a player CAN perform a given action, but not specifying a mechanism to
> do so. I'm not up to date with our existing precedents on that,
> though.
I'm not altogether sure that it is, actually. R2545 says:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:18 PM AIS523--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 19:07 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > You're half right. Regulated actions have been around forever, but
> > after I ruled in my manifestly terrible opinion (TBH, a frustratingly
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 19:07 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> You're half right. Regulated actions have been around forever, but
> after I ruled in my manifestly terrible opinion (TBH, a frustratingly
> large portion of my opinions have been manifestly terrible) in CFJ
> 3557 that
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 6:45 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/16/20 9:39 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:38, AIS523--- via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 15:05 -0800, Kerim
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 21:45, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think I remember hearing that the concept of regulated actions was
> created because a judge ruled the other way - the Rules say that someone
> "CAN" do it (even if not providing a method),
On 1/16/20 9:39 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:38, AIS523--- via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 15:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> Now here we are a third time. Whatever we
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 21:39, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:38, AIS523--- via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 15:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>> > Now here we are a third time. Whatever we can say
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:38, AIS523--- via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 15:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Now here we are a third time. Whatever we can say about CFJ 3694,
> > the judgement is suitably unintuitive
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 15:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Now here we are a third time. Whatever we can say about CFJ 3694,
> the judgement is suitably unintuitive such that almost no one reading
> the rules without this precedent/context thinks that zombie auctions
> actually
nintuitive such that almost no one reading the
rules without this precedent/context thinks that zombie auctions
actually work...
-- Forwarded message -
From: Kerim Aydin
Date: Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 1:12 PM
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Zombie auction fix
To:
Hi folks,
I thought we'd done t
Oops, thanks. I'll make sure the next Registrar report accounts for
zombies being transferred. I think everyone but Rance collected their
zombies.
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 20:11, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I thought we'd done this before, quite recently in fact (unless I'm
>
Hi folks,
I thought we'd done this before, quite recently in fact (unless I'm
misunderstanding the question!). CFJs 3693-3694 found that a zombie CAN be
transferred as the result of an auction, under the current rules.
The case arguments are kind of spread in Discussion, but here's a
Maybe the best solution is your proposal and secure Master at power
threshold 1 instead of 2. If we want auction rules to be able to govern
zombies, it seems hacky to try to keep the power threshold above that
rule's power.
On Sun., Jun. 23, 2019, 10:41 James Cook, wrote:
> That rule is only
That rule is only power 1 and Master is secured at 2. 1885 (zombie
auctions) is power 2.
On Sun., Jun. 23, 2019, 10:08 Jason Cobb, wrote:
> Maybe a more general fix would be in order for auctions?
>
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2551 ("Action End") as follows:
>
> Amend the last paragraph to read:
>
I’m not seeing anything to indicate that you’re submitting that as a
proposal; if you want to, make sure you say so.
-Aris
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 10:08 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> Maybe a more general fix would be in order for auctions?
>
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2551 ("Action End") as follows:
>
>
right, I should know this, I wrote the rule... :P
On 2/24/2018 10:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Auctioneer defaults to Agora (R2547).
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, doesn't an Auctioneer have to be specified?
On 2/24/2018 12:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I
Auctioneer defaults to Agora (R2547).
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, doesn't an Auctioneer have to be specified?
>
> On 2/24/2018 12:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I submit the following Proposal, Zombie Lots, AI-2, co-author Aris, and
> > pend it
Unless I'm missing something, doesn't an Auctioneer have to be specified?
On 2/24/2018 12:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following Proposal, Zombie Lots, AI-2, co-author Aris, and
pend it with shinies:
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
