Re: DIS: Re: BUS: a dumb defense

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: The proposal reads "since" the 1st, so any text with both the right label and correct hash published between April 1 and when the proposal takes effect (If it passes) should trigger it. Texts with label but not correct hash (or vice versa) shouldn't

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: a dumb defense

Darn it. I misread that. Nevermind what I said about not worrying about it. -Aris On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 1:35 PM Kenyon Prater wrote: > It's "since April 1, 2018" not "as of", no? There are other reasons why I > don't think this works though. > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: a dumb defense

The proposal reads "since" the 1st, so any text with both the right label and correct hash published between April 1 and when the proposal takes effect (If it passes) should trigger it. Texts with label but not correct hash (or vice versa) shouldn't affect that. On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: a dumb defense

It's "since April 1, 2018" not "as of", no? There are other reasons why I don't think this works though. On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not published as of the 1st. Don't worry about the proposal too much. > > -Aris > > On Sat, Apr

DIS: Re: BUS: a dumb defense

Not published as of the 1st. Don't worry about the proposal too much. -Aris On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 1:18 PM Kenyon Prater wrote: > I publish the following body of text, labeled TALES OF THE ZOMBIE > APOCALYPSE: { > Nothing happens. > } >