I experienced this same issue in my mail program.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 29, 2017, at 7:40 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> On 07/29/2017 06:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the n
On 07/29/2017 06:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the
new and old parts of your message. As such, until I read more
carefully, I was about to complain that it was now too late for you to
move to reconsideration.
It is possible that
My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the new
and old parts of your message. As such, until I read more carefully, I was
about to complain that it was now too late for you to move to
reconsideration.
It is possible that the raw html format version contains some kind
I have looked again and believe the sequence of events is convoluted
and includes both a failed recusal (sent to A-D) and a failed second
motion to reconsider (you can only file one) but the long and short of
it is that there exists a final judgement which was not mooted (it was
one vote short and
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 22:44 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> P.S. Honourable Arbitor, it may have been useful had you spelled out
> that this was a moot specifically. We don’t have those often and many
> players, myself included, are unfamiliar with them. I nearly forgot
> to spell out that I was AFFI
It wasn't a moot. This reassignment was based off of an earlier recusal.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Ah, quoting styles, one of the great old flamewars. Let’s re-light that
> cautiously, shall we?
>
> > On Jul 24, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> >
> > I reas
Ah, quoting styles, one of the great old flamewars. Let’s re-light that
cautiously, shall we?
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> I reassign CFJ 3537 to o.
The CFJ in question is on the statement
> There is currently more than one auction for Estates.
This was posited in th
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I reassign CFJ 3537 to o.
>>
>> See below for relevant context. (I apologise for the formatting; it
>> seems that our various email clients have been fighting each other
>> about it. We used to use
I also would be open for any advice as to settings for improvement.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 6:35 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I am gmail yeah. I'm just typing into gmail
> w/out doing anything special, if anyone can
> actually t
I oppose putting it in the ruleset, but I would happy to enter a pledge or
informal agreement.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> I reassign CFJ 3537 to o.
>
> See below for relevant context. (I apolog
I am gmail yeah. I'm just typing into gmail
w/out doing anything special, if anyone can
actually tell me what to use I will.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I reassign CFJ 3537 to o.
> >
> > See below for relevant context. (I a
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> I reassign CFJ 3537 to o.
>
> See below for relevant context. (I apologise for the formatting; it
> seems that our various email clients have been fighting each other
> about it. We used to use a consistent format for Agora; perhaps we
> should mandate or
12 matches
Mail list logo
