Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-29 Thread Alexis Hunt
Please note CFJs 1911-1914, which explain that the rules cannot supersede physical reality. On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 05:37 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it would be best to combine the two. > > On 11/28/2017 09:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-29 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I think it would be best to combine the two. On 11/28/2017 09:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Proto: amend r217 by taking out the whole rule-change voiding > clause and replace with: RttCN, a person CAN always initiate 2 > CFJs/week by announcement (other rules might allow more at > an economic

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
Proto: amend r217 by taking out the whole rule-change voiding clause and replace with: RttCN, a person CAN always initiate 2 CFJs/week by announcement (other rules might allow more at an economic cost, but this is the baseline at power-3). On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Wed, 29

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 20:24 Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: Gratuitous Arguments H. Judge, I request you examine all the reasons that Slamming the Door may have failed (i.e. if it's interpreted

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 20:24 Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >> I AP-CFJ, on behalf of VJ Rada, "Rule 2507 does not exist." This is > >> because its enactment was INEFFECTIVE,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread VJ Rada
I agree with Ørjan. This CFJ is _not_ about this particular instance, it's about the adoption of the rule. The judgement should only consider whether the rule facially impermissably interferes with the right to judicial processes, not whether the rule interferes with that right as applied to me.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I AP-CFJ, on behalf of VJ Rada, "Rule 2507 does not exist." This is because its enactment was INEFFECTIVE, per paragraph 3 clause 1 of Rule 217. This is CFJ 3611, I assign it to Aris.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
That was actually my request, so no! (I should have put "by G." after "Gratuitous arguments"). Much appreciated. On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Publius Scribonius

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3611 assigned to Aris

2017-11-28 Thread Aris Merchant
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> I AP-CFJ, on behalf of VJ Rada, "Rule 2507 does not exist." This is >> because its enactment was INEFFECTIVE, per paragraph 3 clause 1 of Rule 217. >