On 8/2/2019 6:10 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I don't need to make anything up, the answer to the question of what a
> rule change is lies in R105.
There is some ambiguity in R105 in terms of "compound" rule changes within a
single Rule, though it may not be relevant to your CFJ at all. For
On 8/2/19 9:03 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
I think the Ossification judgement should address what it means to make a single rule
"change," as opposed to multiple rule changes. That would help us know what it
would mean for an arbitrary rule change to be IMPOSSIBLE.
In particular, i would like to
I think the Ossification judgement should address what it means to make a
single rule "change," as opposed to multiple rule changes. That would help us
know what it would mean for an arbitrary rule change to be IMPOSSIBLE.
In particular, i would like to know: if I can draft a single new rule
A little gratuitous for CFJ 3765-3766:
It's likely that an "arbitrary rule change" can be made by first
making other rule changes to remove any impediments, and then making the
arbitrary change. However, in judging whether some kind of change is
POSSIBLE, we judge based on the current ruleset
4 matches
Mail list logo
