On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Jonathan Rouillard < jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Disclaimer: This fails if I'm not the CotC at the moment. > > Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3372 > > ============================== CFJ 3372 ============================== > > Announcing in Agora-Business the creation of a promise that, > upon being cashed, causes the player cashing said promise to > break a rule, does not cause the creator of said promise to > violate R2394, nor does it cause the creator of said promise to > violate R2394 upon the cashing of said promise. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: lindar > > Judge: OscarMeyr > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by lindar: 09 Jul 2013 16:10:36 GMT > Assigned to arkestra: 15 Jul 2013 17:40:48 GMT > arkestra recused: 21 Jul 2013 15:16:57 GMT > Assigned to Yally: 23 Jul 2013 17:27:54 GMT > Yally recused: 24 Jul 2013 06:14:22 GMT > Assigned to OscarMeyr: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous Arguments by omd: > > It is the casher that would be the Executor, not the creator. > > ======================================================================== > DRAFT: TRUE, as per omd's argument. Rule 2394/0 (Power=1) Crime by Proxy Being the Executor of a message in which another person commits the Class-N Crime of X (for any values of N and X) is the Class-N Crime of X By Proxy -- OscarMeyr who is going for speed and brevity in CFJ decisions.
