On 9/18/19 6:33 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
On 9/17/19 6:28 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8235
Title: Unified fine creation syntax
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") by replacing the text "levying a
fine of up to 2 blots on em" with the text "levying a fine of (a value
not exceeding 2) on em".
The text to replace is not found in Rule 2479/6.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8236
Title: Definition de-capitalization
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors: Aris
Amend Rule 2595 as follows:
In the second sub-bullet under item 2 of the only list, replace the
text "Without N Objections, With N Support, or With N Agoran
Consent" with the text "without N objections, with N support, or
with N Agoran Consent".
This one doesn't invalidate any changes, but it's worth noting that
"with N Agoran Consent" is in the replacement text, but this is
inconsistent with the remainder of the proposal.
My bad on both of those. I won't annoy everyone by submitting a cleanup
to the cleanup :).
--
Jason Cobb
