DIS: Re: OFF: Report Routing
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 04:40, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > I would prefer for Reportor reports to be sent to OFF, even in the absence > of a rule making the Reportor an office. People often read OFF to get a > summary of game affairs at a given time. The Reportor's entries are > astoundingly useful for that purpose. What does everyone else think about > this? > > Also, great work Falsifian! There's a lot going on, and you're doing an > amazing job. > > -Aris Sure, I'll start sending to OFF (remind me if I forget). Yeah, I'm hoping the summaries will be useful for future historical research. - Falsifian
DIS: Re: OFF: Report Routing
I agree. I don't usually read the individual lists separately, but I see the value in it being sent to OFF. On 6/25/2020 12:39 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: I would prefer for Reportor reports to be sent to OFF, even in the absence of a rule making the Reportor an office. People often read OFF to get a summary of game affairs at a given time. The Reportor's entries are astoundingly useful for that purpose. What does everyone else think about this? Also, great work Falsifian! There's a lot going on, and you're doing an amazing job. -Aris -- ATMunn friendly neighborhood notary here :)
DIS: Re: OFF: Report Routing
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:40 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I would prefer for Reportor reports to be sent to OFF, even in the absence > of a rule making the Reportor an office. People often read OFF to get a > summary of game affairs at a given time. The Reportor's entries are > astoundingly useful for that purpose. What does everyone else think about > this? > > Also, great work Falsifian! There's a lot going on, and you're doing an > amazing job. Sigh. This, on the other hand, was not intended to go to OFF. I guess I was thinking about OFF so I typed it in. Sorry everyone. -Aris > >