Compare this:
A player CAN publish a Notice of Honour. For a Notice of Honour
to be valid, it must: [...]
If some bit of text is labeled a Notice of Honour, but doesn't have one of
the other properties right, is it an "invalid Notice of Honour" or just a
mislabeled string of text?
I think the best solution to this is to get the Hash thing working, so the
Astronomor can be the resolver even when e's a combatant (I had a proto
for that, but it's been busy around here lately). Either that or tolerate
much more error from the resolver since all a non-Astronomor resolver
Ah, well, an INEFFECTIVE Proposal submission then.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 18:48, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk <
ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 18:46 +0100, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > I’m pretty convinced about this but I’ve had people not believe it
> > before
> > in a similar
On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 18:46 +0100, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I’m pretty convinced about this but I’ve had people not believe it
> before
> in a similar case elsewhere so I figured I’d ask just in case:
>
> An INEFFECTIVE X, is not formally an X, right?
>
> For example, an INEFFECTIVE Proposal isn’t a
I’m pretty convinced about this but I’ve had people not believe it before
in a similar case elsewhere so I figured I’d ask just in case:
An INEFFECTIVE X, is not formally an X, right?
For example, an INEFFECTIVE Proposal isn’t a Proposal.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 18:37, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Sorry, I keep forgetting you don't have an up-to-date Astronomor report to work
off. I apologise. You are correct, but you need to say it to the public forum.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, February 18, 2019 5:40 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> I was afraid you’d say that. I think
I was afraid you’d say that. I think this reduces twg’s armor from 10 to 0 and
Gaelan’s stays at 10? I confess I haven’t paid much attention to the space
rules though recently.
If this is accurate I’ll resend to official
> On Feb 18, 2019, at 12:37 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> (Pssst! For
(Pssst! For this to be EFFECTIVE I think you also have to say by how much each
of our Armour was reduced by.)
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, February 18, 2019 5:34 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> Resolved battle 003:
>
> Gaelan spent 11 energy.
>
> Twg spent 0 energy.
>
> I think
8 matches
Mail list logo
