On 4/27/2019 7:08 PM, James Cook wrote:
Thanks for your hard work. I'm optimistic that things will gradually
get back on track if the ratio of (reports published and other actions
that clarify the state of the game) to (actions that raise questions)
stays reasonably high for a while. > > And
Good point. I was doing it temporarily for two reasons, but now that I
think about it they aren't great reasons.
* I wanted to be polite by not booting the existing officeholders, but
I guess it's easy enough for the officeholders to reclaim them if they
wan.
* I'm avoiding responsibilities. But
You probably shouldn’t be temporarily deputizing (as in, you should be
doing it normally). The point of that was to stop people from uncessarily
evicting current office holders, but these offices are vacant or
essentially so anyway. If you can’t keep up with the office, you can always
drop it when
For those who aren't following closely: that report is mostly G.'s
work, so credit mostly to G. I just fiddled with the numbers.
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 02:05, James Cook wrote:
>
> I temporarily deputise for Assessor to resolve, as described below, whichever
> of the Agoran decisions to adopt
Thanks for your hard work. I'm optimistic that things will gradually
get back on track if the ratio of (reports published and other actions
that clarify the state of the game) to (actions that raise questions)
stays reasonably high for a while.
And sorry, in hindsight it probably would have been
> For the following tallies, all voters below have a voting strength of 3,
> except for G. who has 4 (Prime Minister) and twg with 0 (9 blots).
Unofficial claims of error about voting strength, sent to the
discussion list since I don't think they affect anything but it's good
to keep track:
*
6 matches
Mail list logo
