G., o, and Aris have all shared my thoughts on the matter, if you do make
that change, then I will consider becoming rulekeepor.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> > How attached is everyone
I love quaternions in my maths, but for this, the current system must be
mantained.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve
>>
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> >> How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve
> >> started applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so
> >>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve
>> started applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so
>> I can just merge them when resolution rolls aroun
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve
> started applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so
> I can just merge them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that
> this system will not work if I h
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve
Huh, that really is quite unspecified nowadays... you could even break the
ordering without violating any rule.
Clearly you should use quaternions.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve started
> applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so I can just
> merge them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that this system
> will not
> On May 25, 2017, at 2:25 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve started
> applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so I can just
> merge them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that this system
> will no
How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve started
applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so I can just merge
them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that this system will not
work if I have to assign sequential ID numbers, as I will not k
9 matches
Mail list logo
