I would be up for playing this. Just one comment below.
> On Oct 27, 2018, at 8:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Any player can become a Competitor and any Competitor can cease to be a
> party to this contract.
I think this should say these things can be done by announcement (as we
No one ever said the last bit. We simply decided that the previous system
was too complicated, and we wanted something lighter weight.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 9:17 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> It was decided the current system was too complicated for how many use
> cases it was applicable
It was decided the current system was too complicated for how many use
cases it was applicable in do Aris made proposals to simplify it and get
rid of the Notary. They are now meant to be more short-term and to serve a
single purpose.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, 21:18 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> (Recent)
(Recent) history question: why did contracts stop being entities that show up
in a report?
Gaelan
> On Oct 27, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> ...here's another idea I've been toying with for a while:
>
>
> This document is a contract between twg (the "Game Master" or "GM")
I'd probably participate in this. One thing worth noting is that, don't
quote me on this, but I don't think parties are a rule-defined term anymore.
On 10/27/2018 8:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
...here's another idea I've been toying with for a while:
This document is a contract between
...here's another idea I've been toying with for a while:
This document is a contract between twg (the "Game Master" or "GM") and one or
more other parties (the "Competitors"). Any player can become a Competitor and
any Competitor can cease to be a party to this contract. The GM cannot cease
6 matches
Mail list logo
