On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 10:14 +1100, Madeline wrote:
> Gratuitous Argument:
> Obviously, the veracity of the statement "This sentence is false" is
> indeterminate, as Rule 2518 ("Determinacy") makes clear. As a
> result, whether or not you owe shinies to Agora is indeterminate,
> whether or not you
Gratuitous Argument:
Obviously, the veracity of the statement "This sentence is false" is
indeterminate, as Rule 2518 ("Determinacy") makes clear. As a result,
whether or not you owe shinies to Agora is indeterminate, whether or not
you owe shinies to Cuddlebeam is indeterminate, and if you
I'm guessing another way this could work is via Pledges which have even
less restrictions. Just custom-write whatever you need to engineer a
paradox. The main concern would be dodging "irrelevant", though. But it
could be doable.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:02 AM, Cuddle Beam
I T B E G I N S.
I'm excited to see the outcome!
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM, Nicholas Evans wrote:
> TTttPF
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Nicholas Evans wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Cuddle Beam
>
Going to do a quick check on possible pitfalls on this
indeterminate/inextricable stuff for Nichdel's variant, just in case
anything is missing to this puzzle. Here are all mentions of "inextricable
conditionals" and "indeterminate" in the ruleset and how I perceive it
interacts with Nichdel's
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Well it seems viable to me so I'll give it a shot I guess lol.
> (Wielding paradoxes is a weird thing, I hope I'm doing it right). Here are
> the proto-actions:
>
>
> I create a contract by paying 1 shiny to Agora,
I favour this case.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 at 21:27 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Well it seems viable to me so I'll give it a shot I guess lol.
> (Wielding paradoxes is a weird thing, I hope I'm doing it right). Here are
> the proto-actions:
>
> I create a contract by paying 1
Well it seems viable to me so I'll give it a shot I guess lol.
(Wielding paradoxes is a weird thing, I hope I'm doing it right). Here are
the proto-actions:
I create a contract by paying 1 shiny to Agora, with the following text:
---
"This sentence is false."
If the statement above is
Maybe this is a dumb question but, wouldn't it be possible to just
"program" yourself some kind of paradox into a contract, for example, some
variant of the Paradox of the Court
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_the_Court where I have to pay
someone or not, then request in a CFJ to know if
9 matches
Mail list logo