No worries - if it's missing it just points to another little gap to fill.
On 2/17/2019 12:12 PM, D. Margaux wrote:>> On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:03 PM,
Kerim Aydin wrote: We used to have a "the judge SHALL NOT
knowingly assign an inappropriate>> judgement" (which is one reason
"appropriate"
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> We used to have a "the judge SHALL NOT knowingly assign an inappropriate
> judgement" (which is one reason "appropriate" is in all the judgement
> choices). Looks like we lost that somewhere along the line? Or am I missing
> it.
I
We used to have a "the judge SHALL NOT knowingly assign an inappropriate
judgement" (which is one reason "appropriate" is in all the judgement
choices). Looks like we lost that somewhere along the line? Or am I
missing it.
It also used to say specifically that motions and moots were to
3 matches
Mail list logo
