On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to be busy and ehird gave me an idea.
[...]
8. Any party with support of a majority of trustees and without objection
from
On 6/23/08, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call for judgement on the following:
* It is possible for ehird to cause woggle to vote by announcing 'On behalf
of woggle: woggle retracts eir votes on proposal 5568 and votes AGAINST x 6
on proposal 5568'.
~~
Oh, my... It really ought
2008/6/23 comex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh, my... It really ought not to be possible to continually exploit
the same paradox to get a win.
I guess woggle should be Plagiarist too.
ehird
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:19 AM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/23/08, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call for judgement on the following:
* It is possible for ehird to cause woggle to vote by announcing 'On behalf
of woggle: woggle retracts eir votes on proposal 5568 and votes
I'm about to be busy and ehird gave me an idea.
I would announce intent to act according to the announcements unless I
specify otherwise of the following when someone creates a partnership with
the following clauses:
1. this Partnership shall be known as the cdm014 board of trustees.
2. No
5 matches
Mail list logo
