DIS: Re: agora-business Digest, Vol 26, Issue 1

2015-07-02 Thread Gaelan Steele
Does objecting to something consent-based do anything? On Jul 2, 2015, at 9:28 AM, agora-business-requ...@agoranomic.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:15 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de mailto:ara...@aixah.de wrote: I intend to award

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7756

2015-07-02 Thread Gaelan Steele
I also removed the plain-text requirement. This means that HTML table tags work. P.S. Whoever came up with the idea to have Reply-To set to agora-discussion, you are a genius. On Jul 2, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 22:50 +0200, Luis Ressel

Re: DIS: Vacation

2015-07-06 Thread Gaelan Steele
My vacation goes from now until about the end of the month. Do I need to say that in BUS? -Gaelan On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sun, 5 Jul 2015, Gaelan Steele wrote: Is there anything I should do Agora-wise before going on a month-long

DIS: Vacation

2015-07-05 Thread Gaelan Steele
Is there anything I should do Agora-wise before going on a month-long vacation?

DIS: Predictions: A Proposal Idea

2015-08-02 Thread Gaelan Steele
I have an idea for a proposal. If there is interest, I will write a formal proposal for it. The idea goes like this: If a player has a guess on what an action taken by another player will be (including a timeframe), they can privately notify all other players. All players (except for the

DIS: Re: BUS: could agora be nearly web 2.0?

2015-08-17 Thread Gaelan Steele
One piece of advice: link terms used to the relevant rules, i.e. whenever a rule contains a text “SHOULD,” that text could be a link to the rule “Mother, May I?”. On Aug 16, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: comment, please:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: $$$$

2015-08-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
Oh, I did 80 characters. Whoops! On Aug 16, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:25:37 -0700 Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote: I submit this proposal: Title

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7785-86

2015-08-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
Tritto. On Aug 16, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Sprocklem sprock...@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-08-16 16:28, Luis Ressel wrote: ID Author(s) AI Title - 7785* G. 1.0

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposals 7780-83

2015-08-02 Thread Gaelan Steele
On Aug 2, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote).

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Long Service Award, Redux

2015-08-02 Thread Gaelan Steele
I support. On Aug 2, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: The previous intent having expired, I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award aranea the Patent Title Nine Months Long Service. -scshunt

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] [AKA Proposal Distribution] Mammon Machine

2015-08-03 Thread Gaelan Steele
I vote against. This sounds like an evil plan for omd to win. On Aug 3, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Sprocklem sprock...@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-08-03 19:29, omd wrote: I submit the following proposal, pend it, and specially deputise for the Promotor to distribute it, thereby expediting it. For this

DIS: Prototype Proposal: $$$$

2015-08-14 Thread Gaelan Steele
Title: Author: Gaelan AI: 1 Create the power-1 rule “$$$” with this text, excluding sections in brackets: The Bankor is an

Re: DIS: Footnotes version

2015-08-14 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’d say submit the RFC thing. I would find it fun, though I don’t think Agora would let it go through. On Aug 14, 2015, at 1:58 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:11 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: No feedback on the concept even? oh well, maybe not worth doing.

Re: DIS: Prototype Proposal: $$$$

2015-08-14 Thread Gaelan Steele
$$$. On Aug 14, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Gaelan Steele wrote: $$$ is a entity switch, tracked by the Bankor in eir weekly report, with possible values being

Re: DIS: yoyo (attn: Registrar)

2015-08-15 Thread Gaelan Steele
Groups has support for categories within lists, but it’s a bit weird: Categories may only be set via the web UI, which means you must post a message, then put it in BUS/DIS/OFF afterward via the site. Categories automatically Reply-To the same category. On Aug 14, 2015, at 8:47 PM, omd

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposal 7757

2015-07-10 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’ll admit I’m not quite sure what this proposal does, other than re-title the proposal. Does it do anything else? On Jul 10, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it. For this

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals

2016-02-04 Thread Gaelan Steele
First, a note: these proposals need to be reissued to require Credits v2 to be adopted instead. Also, is there anything preventing me from taking all of someone's credits for missing a minor deadline? > On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:39 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote: > >

DIS: Re: BUS: 蘭亭社簿記

2017-06-27 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’m pretty sure there was something about a “gentleman” in the Japanese organization; maybe that could be related? Gaelan > On Jun 27, 2017, at 2:48 PM, omd wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> I knew CFJ 3492

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7869-7871

2017-08-17 Thread Gaelan Steele
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

2017-08-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
This is invalid; apologies must be of at least 200 words (https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/#Rule2427 ) Gaelan > On Aug 20, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I apologies for all

DIS: Re: BUS: Accounting error

2017-08-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
, which zeroed Player balances but did not zero Organization > balances. No error has occurred. > > As Secretary, I intend, without 3 objections, to cause a Shiny Relevelling > event no earlier than Saturday, August 26th, 18:00 Pacific Daylight Time. > > -o > >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

2017-08-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
I was planning on working with G to somehow pull the annotations directly out of the CFJ database, but that never got past being an idea. I’ll look into it in the next few days. Gaelan > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug

DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

2017-08-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
If you weren’t aware, the current rules are available at agoranomic.org/ruleset . Gaelan > On Aug 22, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Kyle Anderson wrote: > > I register as a player. > > I’m not really sure what that means, but I am beyond interested

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Registering

2017-08-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
Yes. Pretty much all information about the state of the game is managed by an officer and posted to agora-official. The ADoP keeps track of officeholders, and their latest report is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08221.html

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

2017-08-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
, I am thankful regardless. > > In your estimation, is it important to read the rules in their entirety > before playing? I am completely unsure what actions I should “propose”, as an > example of my ignorance. > > Thanks, > > -K > > From: Gaelan Steele <mailto:g.

DIS: Re: BUS: Use me

2017-08-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
I believe somebody claimed starter kits en masse, so I think you have yours. Gaelan > On Aug 21, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Quazie wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM Quazie > wrote: > I intend, with 24 hours notice,

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Some economic suggestions

2017-05-17 Thread Gaelan Steele
gt; wrote: > > >> On May 17, 2017, at 11:26 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com >> <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: >> >> The only problem I see is that the secretary is free to cheat on the >> randomness with no accountability. It’s possible t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Machine-Readable Reports

2017-05-17 Thread Gaelan Steele
Yes. I intend to deputize as soon as the SLR becomes overdue (is it? I thought G. said it wasn’t, but I thought it was). > On May 17, 2017, at 7:59 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On May 17, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Deputy Tailor] Ribbons

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
I have a cyan now as well. Not sure if the republished report reflects the game state at the time of the initial publishing or the republishing. Gaelan > On May 17, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Quazie wrote: > > COE PSS and I have Cyans > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 20:56 Alex

DIS: The Hypertext Logical Ruleset

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
I quickly threw together an HTML format of the ruleset. The formatting’s a bit off (I’ll be invoking Cleanup Time soon to fix some of it), but it’s decent. It also has keywords link to relative rules, which should make it a bit easier for newcomers to read the ruleset.

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Some economic suggestions

2017-05-17 Thread Gaelan Steele
The only problem I see is that the secretary is free to cheat on the randomness with no accountability. It’s possible to generate verifiable randomness (hash of the Bitcoin block mined immediately after the timestamp of this message); we might want to incorporate that. I see four ways to do

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Machine-Readable Reports

2017-05-17 Thread Gaelan Steele
> >> On May 17, 2017, at 12:41 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >> Very well. I retract my proposal, replacing it with an informal request that >> if someone has a machine-readable record they use to generate their report, >> they publish i

DIS: Re: BUS: Super Election Season

2017-05-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
For Rulekeepor, I've parsed the current FLR into YAML files and am working on scripts to generate the FLR, SLR and probably an HTML file from the YAML. Maybe it would be possible to have proposals submitted as diffs? That way it would be trivial for the Keepor to apply them. If I were elected

DIS: [Proto] G. Shiny repair

2017-05-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
If G.’s shines do become lost, I would like to propose this in advance: Title: Shiny Reshuffling AI: 2 Amend Rule 2487 (Shiny Supply Level) by replacing 1000 with 1001. After any changes to the gamestate occur as a result of the previous change, amend the same rule by replacing 1001 with 1000.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Machine-Readable Reports

2017-05-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
I don't think "machine readable" needs to be defined any more clearly for now—it's a SHOULD, so if you wanted to ignore the rule you'd be perfectly fine anyway. What are the rules for determining the source of a message? Could we have a web-based form for transferring currency that

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7850 (Attempt 1)

2017-05-15 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’ve been watching Agora off and on for a few years now, and I too am saddened to see you go. Before you go, G., would you mind publishing the XML ruleset you mentioned that you had? I imagine it would make life much easier for whoever followed you. > On May 15, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Kerim Aydin

Re: DIS: testing mailman 3

2017-06-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
Looks like the HTML on list.agoranomic.org is already bootstrap, so adding in the header shouldn’t be too hard. Gaelan > On Jun 22, 2017, at 8:20 PM, omd wrote: > > I'd like to change the HTML so it shares the site header (and maybe > other styling) from

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Short Logical Ruleset

2017-06-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
Meh. I don’t believe that’s rule-mandated information; don’t think it’s worth resubmitting for that. Gaelan > On Jun 22, 2017, at 11:00 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 22:58 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canis

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool

2017-06-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
Maybe I'm missing something, but aside from tournaments, does this proposal affect gameplay in any real way or just set the groundwork for future mechanics? > On Jun 19, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > The proposal pool currently contains the

Re: DIS: Proto: Buy low, sell high

2017-06-24 Thread Gaelan Steele
Organization balances (or whatever they're called) are defined as a switch for each (org, player) pair, which has the advantage of creating fewer switch types; I think that's a good thing. Gaelan > On Jun 24, 2017, at 1:17 PM, omd wrote: > > For each Stock, Holdings of

Re: DIS: Proto: Track it on the wiki

2017-06-24 Thread Gaelan Steele
I like the idea of having separate repositories per report (like we have now), which also allows recordkeepors to manage their tooling (under this rule, I couldn't keep the rules in YAML, for example). I think we should keep anything on GitHub as unofficial, which allows record keepers to do

DIS: Vacation upcoming

2017-06-24 Thread Gaelan Steele
I will be in the Northern California mountains with no network access from 7/3 to 7/26; we'll need to think of some plan for Rulekeeping during those 3 weeks. If somebody was willing to take over for that period, I could set up an Agency to allow them to publish the ruleset while I was gone; I

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Some economic suggestions

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
I feel like we currently have two parallel currency systems, shinies and income. I think it is probably a good idea to unify the two at some point. Gaelan > On May 20, 2017, at 12:20 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I might want to tie this to either a decrease in the income

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] OFF: [Deputy Arbitor] Judge assignments

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
> -o > >> On May 20, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >> Wait, did you pay me 40? Did you pay 20 to me, then another 20 to me if you >> got G's shinies? Did you pay me 20, and pay 20 to my nonexistent >> doppelgänger with no tast

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
I assume those links are copypasted from the links in the ruleset itself. If you wanted permalinks, you could link directly to the YAML files in the repo. I don't know of a good way to do versioning of GH pages; I'd need something to talk with GH's API and pull down the correct version of the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cyan Ribbons of the Grand Deputies

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
My family runs our own email as well, and I didn't get it either. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 9:12 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I run my own mail infrastructure (fx: waits for the gasps of shock to die > down) and I didn’t get that, either. I’ll have to check what got

Re: DIS: Proto: Faster Vote Resolution

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
at the beginning of the 24 hour period, and maybe even allow explicitly cancelling the early resolution (without changing their vote). > On May 20, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > > On May 20, 2017, at 2:50 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com >

Re: DIS: Programmable actions:

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
CFJs 1451-1452. My bad. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> >> The rules specify that a game message may be spread across multiple email >> messages as lon

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] OFF: [Deputy Arbitor] Judge assignments

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
isfaction of my pledge to pay for judgements on six outstanding > CFJs, if I inherited G.’s shinies, then I pay 20 Shinies to Gaelan, and I pay > 20 Shinies to Gaelen. > > -o > >> On May 19, 2017, at 12:26 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >

DIS: Proto: Faster Vote Resolution

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
Perhaps I’m impatient, but 7 days is an awfully long time to wait when most players vote within a day or two of the decision being announced. I protose this: Create a rule named “Early Resolution” with power 3.1: If an Agoran decision: 1. Has enough votes such that the result of the decision

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Establishing an Agency can be Expensive

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
ese. > > Also PSS this is what limited agency proposal is for, this awfulness. > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 08:44 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> For the purposes of this message, this is defined as The List: >> Apple >> Banana >> Cat >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Establishing an Agency can be Expensive

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
Could the officer have a shorthand like mine in their report? > On May 20, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 20 May 2017, Quazie wrote: >> You are the worst. I will likely give up superintendent if you Finalize the >> intent on these. >> >> Also

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Deputy Tailor] Ribbons

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
I'm not particularly inclined to, but I'm tempted to deputized for Herald first so that it is impossible for you to fulfill your pledge. Gaelan > On May 18, 2017, at 2:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > Given that the Tailor has

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

2017-05-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
I don't believe this is a valid condition. Gaelan > On May 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, caleb vines wrote: > >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> True, the CoE having been successful, I

Re: DIS: GitHub Notifications

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
I think maybe not. At least with the rule set, I don't think the notifications would be very useful. All of the changes will either be adopted proposals (redundant with the Assessor) or changes to my scripts/the formatting (irrelevant). Gaelan > On May 18, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Publius

Re: DIS: The Wiki, Revived and Revamped

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’ve invited you to the @AgoraNomic organization on GitHub if you’d like to move the wiki there. I figure it’s probably a good idea to have stable URLs for these things instead of moving the ruleset every time the Rulekeepor changes. > On May 4, 2017, at 4:02 PM, Nic Evans

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3505 assigned to Quazie

2017-05-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
I don't know if I've ever seen someone use all-caps SHALL in a pledge. > On May 22, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Quazie wrote: > > Proposal: "Pledge Timelines" AI=1.7 Coauthor='G.' > {{{ > Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following: > {{{ > Breaking a publicly-made

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

2017-05-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
scam. There was no abuse of a specific power exclusive to the Rulekeepor. Gaelan > On May 21, 2017, at 10:46 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > > On May 21, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > >> The following

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No Sneakiness

2017-05-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
within official duties. > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 18:34 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: > I create the power-1 proposal “No Sneakiness” by Gaelan: { > Create a rule “No Sneakiness” with the following text: { > If the rules speci

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
I still don't buy this. I surrounded the apathy attempt in "this section is not part of the report"/"the report resumes below." Regardless of whether that worked, I think that makes it pretty clear I did not intend to ratify that into the ruleset. Gaelan > On May 23, 2017, at 3:50 AM,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: fast resolution 2.0

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
t; wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com > <mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>&

Re: DIS: Votes, Supports, and Objections - OH MY

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
How did gigs work? > On May 23, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Quazie wrote: > > With so much activity, it's hard to keep track of all the things that could > be Supported, Objected, and Voted upon. > > Anyone else having trouble? > > I know we don't need any more officers at the

DIS: Proposal Concept: Hidden Motives

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
I had an interesting idea for a win condition: players privately select a random item from a pre-defined set of goals; when they reach that goal, they win. There would be some complex setup involved in proving that you selected a goal randomly without revealing your selection. I have a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
it. Gaelan > On May 23, 2017, at 7:53 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On May 22, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >> I don’t think the Pink Slip is valid. >> >> Rule 2476/0: "A Pink Slip is a typ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Article 5 invokation

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
The words spell UNDEAD - that’s probably important in some way > On May 23, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > We at least deserve a hint. I looked briefly, but couldn't find the > purported 2012 occurrence. > > -Aris > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at

Re: DIS: Proposal Concept: Hidden Motives

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
sentence, and hash it. Publish the hash. > A recordkeepor just keeps a list of everyone's hash and submission > date. When you reach the goal, publish your original sentence to > prove it. > >> On Tue, 23 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> I had an interesting idea for a win cond

Re: DIS: Proposal Concept: Hidden Motives

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
, 2017-05-23 at 19:36 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: >>> I feel that this would create some interesting gameplay where we >>> would be second-guessing everybody’s moves, wondering if they are >>> part of a win condition. >> >> What's to prevent players just not tr

DIS: Re: BUS: Cleanup on Aisle 869

2017-05-23 Thread Gaelan Steele
Remind me not to sign the message where I resolve this. Gaelan > On May 23, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On May 23, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com >> <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: >> >

Re: DIS: Wow - Proposal Competitions are crazy powerful.

2017-05-26 Thread Gaelan Steele
A stock market could be interesting. Stocks could be real (tied to actual stock data) or just simulated Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 11:01 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I ENCOURAGE someone to come up with an interesting proposal competition. > > I SUGGEST that the economy is

DIS: Rule Numbering

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve started applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so I can just merge them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that this system will not work if I have to assign sequential ID numbers, as I will not

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: 蘭亭社の憲章の修正箇条 2017/05/19

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
"Organizational Restructuring:" > If a Charter does not specify the appropriateness of an amendment to its > Organization, or if it attempts to specify the appropriateness of such an > amendment but in a way that is unclear, ambiguous, circular, inconsistent, > paradoxical, or that depends on

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cleanup Time (and Markdown reward agency)

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
I did. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 2:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Well, since you have had objection you must begin again. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> On Thu, May 1

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

2017-05-21 Thread Gaelan Steele
Darn it all, I snuck one into the middle of the FLR. Gaelan > On May 21, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I object to all intentions to declare winner by apathy that currently exist, > except for those that intend to declare me as winner by apathy. smime.p7s

DIS: Re: BUS: A move

2017-05-21 Thread Gaelan Steele
Don’t tell me this is a registration attempt. > On May 21, 2017, at 8:09 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I deploy the cuttlefish. > > Authentication: cerebellum. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

2017-05-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
;> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 01:46 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> On May 21, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >>> >>> The following section is not a portion of the report: >>> For the purposes of this section, The Sentence is “I

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7853-7857

2017-05-21 Thread Gaelan Steele
> On May 21, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Resolving MKD

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg28175.html > On May 20, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > MKD? I can't find the initial intent? > >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:10 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: &g

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Resolving MKD

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
*sigh* > On May 20, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > "clear and ambiguous" not unambiguous? > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:09 PM, G

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Super Election Season

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
My vote goes to the GitHub. > On May 20, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Edward Murphy wrote: > > ais523 wrote: > >> Secretary: One of the more difficult offices. (It's the spiritual >> successor of Notary, which I held for a long time and was rather time- >> consuming). However, having

DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’ve experimentally restructured the categories in the Ruleset in an attempt to make it easier to find rules–feedback on the new categories? https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/ Gaelan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Alien Contact Program

2017-05-21 Thread Gaelan Steele
Just create the agency again; you have no obligation to resolve your 24 hours’ notice. > On May 20, 2017, at 11:08 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > > I need to adjust it then lol (I think I can only do that once it actually > materializes though). Thank you for telling me.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

2017-05-21 Thread Gaelan Steele
This was my wording: The following section is not a portion of the report: For the purposes of this section, The Sentence is “I intend, without objection, to declare [word], specifying myself.” I execute The Sentence, substituting [word] for a word beginning with “ap” that is a synonym for “not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Resolving MKD

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
h the following > information` is a valid intent to establish an agency. > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:38 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com > <mailto:quazieno...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Ah-ha! Thanks. > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:37 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@cani

Re: DIS: Re: Draft: Promotor Report

2017-05-20 Thread Gaelan Steele
Don’t remember who mentioned this, but I agree that the todo list would do fine as an org. Pay shinies to list something (or add to the existing bounty), get the shinies for completing it. Gaelan > On May 20, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On

Re: DIS: Regulating snark

2017-05-29 Thread Gaelan Steele
I don't like the voting strength bit—I don't think there is any harm in creating a temporary grudge whenever you vote AGAINST. Gaelan > On May 29, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Quazie wrote: > > Proto proposal: Grudge. > > There exists an asset called a Grudge. > > Each Grudge

Re: DIS: Sites Progress

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
Will do when I get home Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >> * The original agora front page has been replicated, and is in the process of >> being updated. > > Cool!! > > Do you mind if a top

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3515 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
FYI: I ruled a similar case as TRUE because "action" is undefined. Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 4:14 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 00:21 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: >> I pay 1 Shiny to Quazie, fulfilling, if it was ever valid, my Pledge >> appended in

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Court Gazette

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can >> access. >> I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from the >> FLR tonig

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: CFJ 3509 Judgement (Dismissed, insufficient information)

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
are at you menacingly for ignore my wishes. > > I have gotten the mailing list to accept 天火狐 as my name as of this message, > and if everything goes well it should use that for the name field of the > email than pulling directly from gmail, hopefully. > > 天火狐 > >> On 25 Ma

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: CFJ 3509 Judgement (Dismissed, insufficient information)

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
Idea: "offer" CFJs instead of assigning them. Have an Agency that lets us accept an offered CFJ, at which point it actually assigns. > On May 25, 2017, at 7:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: >> As for removing myself,

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Court Gazette

2017-05-25 Thread Gaelan Steele
I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can access. I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from the FLR tonight. Gaelan > On May 25, 2017, at 2:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > [Comments on the below

Re: DIS: Supply Level Change - Proto

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
Why require the secretary's action? Why not just "if, at any point, the sum of all Balance switches does not equal the Balance Level" Gaelan > On May 18, 2017, at 12:53 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I proto-submit the following proto-proposal entitled "Shiny Releveling Event"

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: 蘭亭社の憲章の修正箇条 2017/05/19

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
Where? > On May 19, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > It has already been determined that Japanese acceptable. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > 2017-05-19 11:08 GMT-04:0

Re: DIS: The Gmail (or really modern web mail) problem

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
Why is this related to webmail? > On May 19, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Quazie wrote: > > Proto-Proposal: This time to a public forum > Create a new rule, power .5 entitled "Traveling Message Infraction" with the > following text: > {{{ > Players SHOULD NOT muddy up the waters

Re: DIS: CFJ data for FLR

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> Currently our CFJ data is a bit duplicated between the Rulekeepor's and >> Arbritor's records. I think it would be optimal if we did things like this: &

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Ambiguity

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
Whew. I wasn't excited about that. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I would like to judge this. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Quazie

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3501 assigned to ais523

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
I remember reading something in the FLR saying it wasn't. I'm not sure if it was a CFJ or a rule, but registration is special anyway. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Quazie wrote: > > Valid - I was unsure if subject line only information was considered valid >

Re: DIS: Bleach, what is it good for?

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
Yeah, that confused me. To stay on the safe side, I went to a lot of effort to preserve white space when I imported the ruleset until I could invoke Cleanup Time. Gaelan > On May 19, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I was looking at the following rule when trying to

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7852

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
FOR Gaelan > On May 16, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the

DIS: Re: [Arbitor] OFF: [Deputy Arbitor] Judge assignments

2017-05-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
My reading of the rules (person can communicate logical thoughts, player is a registered person) makes me believe that Alexis and scshunt refer to the same player, and therefore are synonyms. Therefore, I believe that the ratified Tailor’s report is equivalent to this: Alexis: CWY scshunt:

  1   2   3   4   5   >