Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Part 2

2019-01-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 1/22/2019 10:24 AM, D. Margaux wrote:>> On Jan 20, 2019, at 7:25 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >> It’s definitely 1,000,000,000 actions, according to CFJ 3597, but >> I think that CFJ may also suggest that we can only levy one fine (I’m not >> sure about that though). > > I admit that I don’t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Part 2

2019-01-22 Thread D. Margaux
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 7:25 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > It’s definitely 1,000,000,000 actions, according to CFJ 3597, but > I think that CFJ may also suggest that we can only levy one fine (I’m not > sure about that though). I admit that I don’t fully understand this CFJ decision. However,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Part 2

2019-01-22 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I don't even know where to start figuring this out, so it would be good to CFJ "D. Margaux has committed at least 1,000,000,000 rule violations", but we need some way to get it assigned without D. Margaux interfering via eir position as Arbitor (the earliest e can be impeached is Friday). Any

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Part 2

2019-01-20 Thread Aris Merchant
In any case, I think it's clear that e must be given the maximum possible sentence. After all "The fine SHOULD be increased to the degree that the violation is willful, profitable, egregious, or an abuse of an official position.", and this is all of the above. -Aris On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:25

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Part 2

2019-01-20 Thread Aris Merchant
Unfortunately, I think the common definition makes it rather clear what’s going on. It’s definitely 1,000,000,000 actions, according to CFJ 3597, but I think that CFJ may also suggest that we can only levy one fine (I’m not sure about that though). -Aris On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:17 PM Timon