2009/4/8 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
It occurs to me for the first time in this case that there's actually
only *one* method, by announcement, and that two different rules happen
to agree on conditions where that mechanism can be used. If the conditions
in the two rules are
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 13:45 -0500, comex wrote:
If Rule A says:
A person CAN deregister by announcement.
and Rule B says:
A person CAN deregister by announcement; e CANNOT register for thirty
days thereafter.
then, by Rule 478, a person takes the action of deregistering by
Thinking about it, I agree.
2009/4/9 comex com...@gmail.com:
2009/4/8 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
It occurs to me for the first time in this case that there's actually
only *one* method, by announcement, and that two different rules happen
to agree on conditions where that mechanism
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
That would imply that a player could remove all their Rests by spending
just 2 Notes. After all, you CAN destroy a Rest by spending 2 Notes. So
your Note spend destroys as many Rests as you want...
I don't see what your
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:25 -0500, comex wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
That would imply that a player could remove all their Rests by spending
just 2 Notes. After all, you CAN destroy a Rest by spending 2 Notes. So
your Note spend destroys as
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Hmm... suppose the Scorekeepor is a contestmaster, and e rewards another
contestmaster due to monthly rewards. Does that count against the points
limit of eir contest?
Hmm, so we have (let's assume e is also the contestmaster
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:08 -0500, comex wrote:
Is there another possible interpretation I'm missing?
It's the difference between awarding points per the contest-award rule,
and awarding points per the rewarding-contestmasters rule. The mechanism
by which something is legal is part of the
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 13:45 -0500, comex wrote:
... I prefer the latter, and
this applies to all such actions-- under the current contest rules, if
a contestmaster of two contests awards points to a member of both
contests, this counts against eir total
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, comex wrote:
2009/4/9 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
However, if you look at the contest rules (R2233), the construct that
the contest owns a certain number of points, so the action is actually
awarding a subset of these 5N points from this contest while the
2009/4/9 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
However, if you look at the contest rules (R2233), the construct that
the contest owns a certain number of points, so the action is actually
awarding a subset of these 5N points from this contest while the
Scorekeepor (R2234) awards a subset of [a
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I readily agree that it's a stretch. My first conclusion this morning
was the same as yours (Uh oh, this means points are broken), then I was
seeing if there was a way to save them. There is some slight
linguistic
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, comex wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I readily agree that it's a stretch. My first conclusion this morning
was the same as yours (Uh oh, this means points are broken), then I was
seeing if there was a way to save them.
12 matches
Mail list logo
