CoE: I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself? Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> COUR
You know, explicit listing of valid options is something we should
add.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I vote PRESENT, to avoid causing quorum fail. I will probably revise later.
>
> H. Herald, have you prepared a list of eligible proposals and/or any
> suggestions of highly relevant
Followup: I think the last couple Silver Quills have also had lackluster
voting and kind of a "yeah, I guess that one" vibe to it instead of
popular acclaim.
I wonder if this is one like Bard that we should retire as an official
mechanism.
What do you think of bringing back a list of criteria
NttPF
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
CoE: I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself? Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
==
Aris wrote:
This doesn't take Eastman weeks into account.
Bah. Anyone should feel free to submit a fixed version of that part.
G. wrote:
CoE: I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself? Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...
I interpreted the recusals as "assigned continuously since Nov 1",
though if judgements aren't forthcoming then I
ATMunn wrote:
You do realize, by the way, that the all the tildes (~) are supposed to
be dashes (-), right?
The tildes were a joke for the Christmas report.
I mean, if you like this way better, that's fine, but reports usually
use dashes instead. :P
I hadn't, no, I was just maintaining (wha
7 matches
Mail list logo
