Re: DIS: Proto: More Advanced Land Features

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > Q*Bert has a color switch, add "tracked by the cartographer"

Re: DIS: Proto: More Advanced Land Features

Yay! Q*Bert might come back! Also, I move to split the proposal. OscarMeyr

DIS: Proto: More Advanced Land Features

Title: More Advanced Land Features AI: 1 Author: Trigon Co-authors: Create a new rule (Power=1.0) entitled "Winning by Ownership" with the text: If, at any time, a single player owns more Land Units than all other entities combined, e wins the game. Re-enact rule 2046 (Power=1.0)

Re: DIS: Proto: More Advanced Land Features

That's great, but let me remind you that currently, Agora must own at least approx. half Land Units - auctions only take place if less than 1/2 LUs are privately owned. Also, you should set it that the winner loses some LUs upon winning, or e'll win an infinite number of times and keep winning,

Re: DIS: Proto: More Advanced Land Features

I'm not a fan of the purple. I'd like to keep the traditional go board for a while, even if we're not playing go on it. -Aris On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:15 PM Reuben Staley wrote: > CHANGES: >- Added Purple land type to better match P4471 >- Got rid of first

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] Land Auctions for April week 2, part 2

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > I transfer 1 coin to Quazie and Ouazie pays 1 coin to Agora for the > > land e won, me acting on eir behalf If Quazie didn't have the coin when the auction ended, eir bid was cancelled (R2551): When an Auction ends, any bid placed by an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] Land Auctions for April week 2, part 2

Oh well. I'd at least argue that Quazie's payment to Agora didn't succeed, as e didn't win a land unit. IIRC somebody stated that there is a consensus that with explicit purpose (I do X to/for Y), the action doesn't happen if it couldn't fulfill the purpose. As for the split message, I sent the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] Land Auctions for April week 2, part 2

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Corona wrote: As for the split message, I sent the first one accidentally and the " ...for the purpose of paying for the land I won." part was just meant as a clarification to players. I believe that the payment works even without explicitly stating the purpose, as the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] Land Auctions for April week 2, part 2

True. We should probably add that to a general disambiguation rule. Seems to pop up a lot. -Aris On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Corona wrote: > >> As for the split message, I sent the first one accidentally and the " >> ...for

Re: DIS: Proto: More Advanced Land Features

CHANGES: - Added Purple land type to better match P4471 - Got rid of first part - Added more land type changing rules - Made it more fun in general - Also patched a bug Title: Q*Bert the Second AI: 2 Author: Trigon Co-authors: G., Corona Amend rule 1995 "Land Types" by doing the

DIS: The open CFJs

I think there are two CFJs which players intended to assign themselves: they should now do so. -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Vote for me!

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote: Also, are my messages showing up for everyone else as not being wrapped? When I'm typing, the message shows up as being wrapped, but when I look at the message after it's been sent, it's not wrapped. (like, for example, this message shows up as 5 lines right

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Cartographor] Land Auctions for April week 2, part 2

So did you just pay 1 coin or 2, and if the former, did it count as paying for the auction? By rule 2166, "paid" is a general synonym for "transferred", and in general actions are not allowed to be modified by future messages. Greetings, Ørjan. On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Corona wrote: ...for