DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077-8085, 8088 and 8087

2018-08-25 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Actually, upon re-reading rule 2350/9, I think my statement that proposals can't be distributed three times may be incorrect. It would make more sense if the word "once" in the rule meant a proposal could only be redistributed once each time it failed quorum (which is eminently sensible -

Re: DIS: Hello

2018-08-25 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
That seems like a precedent with an interesting story behind it. What happened? -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 25, 2018 5:47 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:36 PM Alex Smith ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 22:30 -0700, Aris

Re: DIS: Hello

2018-08-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
Welcome!!! You've sent this to the discussion forum (agora-discussion@agoranomic.org). With rare exception, no actions sent to this forum do anything. To register, send the same message to agora-busin...@agoranomic.org. You should subscribe to that and also agora-offic...@agoranomic.org.

Re: DIS: Hello

2018-08-25 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
There's a far more straightforward argument for this not working as a registration message: it was sent to agora-discussion, which is not a public forum. (Though I admit I did check the most recent Registrar report on agora-official to check that G. hadn't sneakily reclassified it as a public

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Aris Merchant
You definitely aren’t obliged to keep them updated. Keeping existing ones in the ruleset is preferable, but isn’t imminently necessary. It’s annoying not to have them in the long run, so it would be nice if they could be added back in, but it shouldn’t stop you from taking the office. Thanks for

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Reuben Staley
I didn't include them because I was afraid that there would be more CFJs I should add to the list that someone would get mad at me for not including. If you would like to take the office of Rulekeepor, I can write some code to include annotations and you can deal with adding the new ones because

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I've been looking into the possibility of taking over Rulekeepor, in the absence of any other willing candidate, and have been looking through your ruleset generation system. One thing I'd like to ask (to everyone, not just you) is whether the inclusion of major CFJs in the Full Logical

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Reuben Staley
Oh, also, would you like me to add some documentation? Figuring out Alexis' system was a bit of a pain for me. On Sat, Aug 25, 2018, 16:27 Reuben Staley wrote: > I didn't include them because I was afraid that there would be more CFJs I > should add to the list that someone would get mad at me

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I'm not sure - I haven't actually looked at the code or tried to install anything yet, I'm still in the "this is a thing that might happen" stage - but anything you can tell me is useful. The format of the YAML files seems pretty self-explanatory, though. I don't know a great deal of Python

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
I'm ~a year behind in updating (and have been stuck midway in porting it to Agoranomic.org since spring) but old CFJs are here: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/ But updating those in the FLR is definitely an optional extra. Very much optional. On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, Timon

DIS: Re: BUS: There's always something we miss

2018-08-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
Yes you are absolutely doing it right :). Good catch. On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, D Margaux wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I Call for Judgement (barring twg) on the following statement: “D. Margaux > currently has in eir possession 5 incense.” > > Argument in favor: R2499 does state quite clearly that,

Re: DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
Also for recent stuff, the "recently-resolved cases" sections of the court gazette has summaries that can be grabbed for annotations. On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I'm ~a year behind in updating (and have been stuck midway in porting it > to Agoranomic.org since spring) but old