Actually, upon re-reading rule 2350/9, I think my statement that proposals
can't be distributed three times may be incorrect. It would make more sense if
the word "once" in the rule meant a proposal could only be redistributed once
each time it failed quorum (which is eminently sensible -
That seems like a precedent with an interesting story behind it. What happened?
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 25, 2018 5:47 AM, Aris Merchant
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:36 PM Alex Smith ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
> > On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 22:30 -0700, Aris
You've sent this to the discussion forum (firstname.lastname@example.org).
With rare exception, no actions sent to this forum do anything. To
register, send the same message to agora-busin...@agoranomic.org. You
should subscribe to that and also agora-offic...@agoranomic.org.
There's a far more straightforward argument for this not working as a
registration message: it was sent to agora-discussion, which is not a public
forum. (Though I admit I did check the most recent Registrar report on
agora-official to check that G. hadn't sneakily reclassified it as a public
You definitely aren’t obliged to keep them updated. Keeping existing ones
in the ruleset is preferable, but isn’t imminently necessary. It’s annoying
not to have them in the long run, so it would be nice if they could be
added back in, but it shouldn’t stop you from taking the office. Thanks for
I didn't include them because I was afraid that there would be more CFJs I
should add to the list that someone would get mad at me for not including.
If you would like to take the office of Rulekeepor, I can write some code
to include annotations and you can deal with adding the new ones because
I've been looking into the possibility of taking over Rulekeepor, in the
absence of any other willing candidate, and have been looking through your
ruleset generation system.
One thing I'd like to ask (to everyone, not just you) is whether the inclusion
of major CFJs in the Full Logical
Oh, also, would you like me to add some documentation? Figuring out Alexis'
system was a bit of a pain for me.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018, 16:27 Reuben Staley wrote:
> I didn't include them because I was afraid that there would be more CFJs I
> should add to the list that someone would get mad at me
I'm not sure - I haven't actually looked at the code or tried to install
anything yet, I'm still in the "this is a thing that might happen" stage - but
anything you can tell me is useful. The format of the YAML files seems pretty
I don't know a great deal of Python
I'm ~a year behind in updating (and have been stuck midway in porting it
to Agoranomic.org since spring) but old CFJs are here:
But updating those in the FLR is definitely an optional extra. Very much
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, Timon
Yes you are absolutely doing it right :). Good catch.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> Hi everyone!
> I Call for Judgement (barring twg) on the following statement: “D. Margaux
> currently has in eir possession 5 incense.”
> Argument in favor: R2499 does state quite clearly that,
Also for recent stuff, the "recently-resolved cases" sections of the court
has summaries that can be grabbed for annotations.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I'm ~a year behind in updating (and have been stuck midway in porting it
> to Agoranomic.org since spring) but old
Mail list logo