Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[Ørjan Johansen]

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:


Per Rule 879, failing to state quorum is illegal but does not invalidate
the decision.


Although failing to state quorum is not quite the same thing as stating it 
incorrectly, so I'm not sure Rule 879 actually _says_ that it's not 
invalidated. However, I didn't find anything that says it _is_ invalidated 
either.


Greetings,
Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[ATMunn]

I thought it was something like that. It seems I did vote for it.

On 4/29/2018 5:06 PM, Ned Strange wrote:

If you voted for G's recent proposal you are eligible

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:45 AM, ATMunn  wrote:

I know, I was referring to what the proposal/scam was.


On 4/29/2018 2:33 PM, Corona wrote:


Nothing in particular is specified in the rule, in practice it's for
scamming/passing a proposal to that effect.

~Corona

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, ATMunn  wrote:


Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing
let people get them.

On 4/29/2018 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:




I vote ATMunn for Tailor.

ATMunn - you can deputize for the job.  I'm about 99% sure that the only
ribbons since the Feb report were this week's black ones.

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:


I vote for myself, obviously.

[also I guess I better get working on that Python script I talked
about...]

On 4/29/2018 3:08 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:


Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of
the
Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
voting method is instant runoff.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[Ned Strange]

If you voted for G's recent proposal you are eligible

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:45 AM, ATMunn  wrote:
> I know, I was referring to what the proposal/scam was.
>
>
> On 4/29/2018 2:33 PM, Corona wrote:
>>
>> Nothing in particular is specified in the rule, in practice it's for
>> scamming/passing a proposal to that effect.
>>
>> ~Corona
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, ATMunn  wrote:
>>
>>> Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing
>>> let people get them.
>>>
>>> On 4/29/2018 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>


 I vote ATMunn for Tailor.

 ATMunn - you can deputize for the job.  I'm about 99% sure that the only
 ribbons since the Feb report were this week's black ones.

 On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:

> I vote for myself, obviously.
>
> [also I guess I better get working on that Python script I talked
> about...]
>
> On 4/29/2018 3:08 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
>> Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of
>> the
>> Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
>> ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
>> voting method is instant runoff.
>>
>>
>

>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[ATMunn]

I know, I was referring to what the proposal/scam was.

On 4/29/2018 2:33 PM, Corona wrote:

​Nothing in particular is​ specified in the rule, in practice it's for
scamming/passing a proposal to that effect.

~Corona

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, ATMunn  wrote:


Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing
let people get them.

On 4/29/2018 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:




I vote ATMunn for Tailor.

ATMunn - you can deputize for the job.  I'm about 99% sure that the only
ribbons since the Feb report were this week's black ones.

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:


I vote for myself, obviously.

[also I guess I better get working on that Python script I talked
about...]

On 4/29/2018 3:08 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:


Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
voting method is instant runoff.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[Alex Smith]

On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 20:33 +0200, Corona wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, ATMunn 
> wrote:
> > Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what
> > thing let people get them.
>
> Nothing in particular is specified in the rule, in practice it's for
> scamming/passing a proposal to that effect.

Right, it's intended to be gotten either via scam, or via bribing
people to vote for your proposal to give you one.

G. somehow managed both at the same time recently.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[Corona]

​Nothing in particular is​ specified in the rule, in practice it's for
scamming/passing a proposal to that effect.

~Corona

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, ATMunn  wrote:

> Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing
> let people get them.
>
> On 4/29/2018 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I vote ATMunn for Tailor.
>>
>> ATMunn - you can deputize for the job.  I'm about 99% sure that the only
>> ribbons since the Feb report were this week's black ones.
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>>> I vote for myself, obviously.
>>>
>>> [also I guess I better get working on that Python script I talked
>>> about...]
>>>
>>> On 4/29/2018 3:08 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>>>
 Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
 Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
 ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
 voting method is instant runoff.


>>>
>>

DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[ATMunn]

Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing 
let people get them.


On 4/29/2018 12:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:



I vote ATMunn for Tailor.

ATMunn - you can deputize for the job.  I'm about 99% sure that the only
ribbons since the Feb report were this week's black ones.

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:

I vote for myself, obviously.

[also I guess I better get working on that Python script I talked about...]

On 4/29/2018 3:08 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:

Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
voting method is instant runoff.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[ATMunn]

Yeah I did that when I was ADoP. It's an easy mistake to make.

On 4/29/2018 4:23 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:

Per Rule 879, failing to state quorum is illegal but does not invalidate
the decision.

-Aris

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 1:15 AM Ned Strange 
wrote:


Also you forgot to state the quorum, so this is no Agoran Decision at all.

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Ned Strange 
wrote:

Vote ATMunn

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Edward Murphy 

wrote:

Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
voting method is instant runoff.





--
 From V.J. Rada




--
 From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[Ned Strange]

Sorry! I'm still traumatized by the brief period where I had to
initiate Agoran Decisions.

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Aris Merchant
 wrote:
> Per Rule 879, failing to state quorum is illegal but does not invalidate
> the decision.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 1:15 AM Ned Strange 
> wrote:
>
>> Also you forgot to state the quorum, so this is no Agoran Decision at all.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Ned Strange 
>> wrote:
>> > Vote ATMunn
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Edward Murphy 
>> wrote:
>> >> Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
>> >> Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
>> >> ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
>> >> voting method is instant runoff.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > From V.J. Rada
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From V.J. Rada
>>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Voting on Tailor

[Aris Merchant]

Per Rule 879, failing to state quorum is illegal but does not invalidate
the decision.

-Aris

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 1:15 AM Ned Strange 
wrote:

> Also you forgot to state the quorum, so this is no Agoran Decision at all.
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Ned Strange 
> wrote:
> > Vote ATMunn
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Edward Murphy 
> wrote:
> >> Per Rule 2154, I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
> >> Tailor election. The vote collector is the ADoP, the valid options are
> >> ATMunn and Corona and anyone else who becomes a candidate, and the
> >> voting method is instant runoff.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From V.J. Rada
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>