DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

I wrote: =Metareport= You can find an up-to-date version of this report at http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php Date of last report: 2023-01-15 Date of this report: 2023-01-20 Unofficial CoE, accepted: "Date of this report" should have been 2023-01-22. (The script that

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 11:16 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: > Sun, Jan 16 2022 (19:11:41) - ais523 published the Mad Engineer's weekly > report > Sun, Jan 16 2022 (19:14:39) - Murphy published the Tailor's weekly report I'm impressed that you were able to react this quickly

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Trigon wrote: On 10/31/20 11:45 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: Office Report    Last Published Late Coopor Barrels, Bargains 2020-10-01 Herald

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On 10/31/20 11:45 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: Office Report    Last Published Late Coopor Barrels, Bargains 2020-10-01 Herald Patent titles 

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

I wrote: Mon, Jul 13 2020 (21:11:21) - ATMunn published the Notary's weekly report Mon, Jul 13 2020 (21:11:21) - ATMunn published the Notary's weekly report Unofficial CoE, accepted: This was actually a CoE followed by a single revision. Fixed in database.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

ATMunn wrote: On 7/12/2020 12:21 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: OFFICES Office Holder[1]  Since Last Election Notary ATMunn 2020-06-07    2020-06-15 Not a CoE because

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On 7/12/2020 12:21 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: OFFICES Office Holder[1]  Since Last Election Notary ATMunn 2020-06-07    2020-06-15 Not a CoE because I could be

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport (attempted, also attn Treasuror)

yet another unintuitive way this switch works (but yes e gets 2 extra votes on econ proposals) Btw Notice of Honour +1 Trigon for a really tough report in a crazy week -1 Murphy, I actually am upset that you stole ADoP from me on a technicality despite the fact that I won two elections for it.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport (attempted, also attn Treasuror)

On 2020-07-06 18:34, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: INTERESTS - Office Interest [snip] Treasuror  Economy, Economy I get

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport (attempted, also attn Treasuror)

On 7/6/2020 8:36 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: On 7/6/20 8:34 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: INTERESTS - Office Interest

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport (attempted, also attn Treasuror)

On 7/6/20 8:34 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: > On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: >> INTERESTS >> - >> >> Office Interest >> > [snip] >> Treasuror  Economy,

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport (attempted, also attn Treasuror)

On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: INTERESTS - Office Interest [snip] Treasuror  Economy, Economy I get that the Treasuror is *really* involved with the economy,

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport (attempted, also attn Treasuror)

On 7/2/20 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: > MONTHLY REPORTS > > Office ReportLast Published Late > > Coopor Barrels, Bargains 1969-12-31 !!!

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADOP] Metareport Revision 1

The below document is my revised Metareport (ADoP weekly) valid as of 4:12 am UTC on the 21st of June 2020. The only difference is that Aris is correctly listed as Prime Minister. =Metareport= > > This is the ADoP’s weekly report > > Date of last report: 2020-06-13 > > Date of this

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On 11/3/19 10:51 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: Only a comment, since this isn't self-ratifying: ais523 is only a player if CFJ 3776 is judged TRUE. Sorry, ais523 is only a /candidate/ if CFJ 3776 is judged TRUE. -- Jason Cobb

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On 11/3/19 1:41 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote: ELECTIONS Office Initiated   Phase   Candidates Prime Minister 2019-11-03  Nominating  Murphy Speaker    2019-10-20  

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Not to the public forum Jason Cobb On 6/17/19 8:09 AM, Rebecca wrote: CoE: there is no astronomor or clork post te sidegame suspension act On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:18 PM Edward Murphy wrote: =Metareport= You can find an up-to-date version of this report at

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

CoE: there is no astronomor or clork post te sidegame suspension act On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:18 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > =Metareport= > You can find an up-to-date version of this report at > http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php > > Date of last report: 2019-05-19 > Date of

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019, Edward Murphy wrote: I transfer a kudo from myself (for overlooking this) to twg (for pointing it out). That takes me back. But it's all about karma nowadays. Which is probably a bit more flexible. Greetings, Ørjan.

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

NB: You might already have known this, but Politics creates a couple of new obligations for you: you are now supposed to track offices' Complexity and award favours for Efficiency (currently Substance Use Liberals favours) each week. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, January

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sunday, January 13, 2019 6:12 PM, Edward Murphy wrote: > You can find an up-to-date version of this report at > http://localhost/adop/report.php Funnily enough, I don't appear to be able to. -twg

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, ATMunn wrote: For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second I missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP report. Hm, I don't recall doing anything out of the ordinary for that message. I deleted the copy I got back from

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second I missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP report. On 11/4/2018 8:39 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: [twg intended to deputise for Referee on Nov 1, though

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: [twg intended to deputise for Referee on Nov 1, though I don't think it was effective; see my recent CFJ] COE: E did, see my gratuitous argument. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on > > that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again? > > > > >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on > that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again? > > Once (or n-ce) upon a time, the Speaker was the backup for all

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

I’m a bit swamped with schoolwork at the moment, but I’ll deputize if I get a chance. Gaelan > On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on > that list. Gaelan, are you

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again? -Aris On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:51 AM Edward Murphy wrote: > G. wrote: > > >> Prime Minister*(vacant) 2018-02-28[2] (ongoing) > >

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

> Prime Minister*(vacant) 2018-02-28[2] (ongoing) Can the prime minister election be resolved please?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

G. wrote: On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: ArbitorMurphy 2018-01-28(ongoing) 2 Did someone re-start this election after winning it? This is one that was confusing me earlier. No, that's incorrect data, will fix shortly.

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > ArbitorMurphy 2018-01-28(ongoing) 2 Did someone re-start this election after winning it? This is one that was confusing me earlier.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

ATMunn wrote: You do realize, by the way, that the all the tildes (~) are supposed to be dashes (-), right? The tildes were a joke for the Christmas report. I mean, if you like this way better, that's fine, but reports usually use dashes instead. :P I hadn't, no, I was just maintaining

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

You do realize, by the way, that the all the tildes (~) are supposed to be dashes (-), right? The tildes were a joke for the Christmas report. I mean, if you like this way better, that's fine, but reports usually use dashes instead. :P On 1/28/2018 6:24 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport mark...9?

sshhh both reports are now late but i wanted to report on last week and not trickle over to this one. my reporting is so bad *facepalm*. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Yes, but the report is based on the

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport mark...9?

Yes, but the report is based on the effective date. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Except it *is* late now because it's October. > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 at 20:42 VJ Rada

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport mark...9?

Except it *is* late now because it's October. On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 at 20:42 VJ Rada wrote: > Notably this makes the FLR also not late. Mark 10 let's go. COE: The > FLR isn't late. > > I accept my CoE > > =Metareport= > This report is effective as of 11pm GMT on Sunday

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport: Happy edition

Of course you did. Yep. I'm on phone now, I'll see about it later. On Sunday, October 1, 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I CFJ (with AP): in the below-quoted message, V.J. Rada issued a claim of > error. > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, 08:41 VJ Rada,

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport: Happy edition

I accept PSS's CoE I publish the following report of the ADoP. =Metareport= This report is effective as of the time of its publishing. Date of Last Report: 2017-09-03 Consolidation (filled offices over officeholders): 2 Filled offices %: 94.44 Late reports %: 17.65 Please do not call

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Rule 2143, penultimate paragraph. With tongue firmly in cheek, -o > On Sep 23, 2017, at 9:46 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Quazie's tables were worse, so I assumed it didn't matter. I can make > more of an effort next week. > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Ørjan Johansen

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Quazie's tables were worse, so I assumed it didn't matter. I can make more of an effort next week. On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> ===Metareport=== > > > Your tables are horribly misaligned. I suggest using a

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: ===Metareport=== Your tables are horribly misaligned. I suggest using a programming editor that can actually handle monospace text. (And don't use tab characters.) Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

I meant in the technical sense - should I make a claim of error, and if so, what is the nature of the error? I can’t see any reason simple duplication wouldn’t be formally acceptable, even if it is messy, but the ratification parts of the rules aren’t my forté. -o > On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:33

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Gah - i'll republish the single correct body shortly On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:31 Owen Jacobson wrote: > Is the duplicated report body an error? > > -o > > On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Quazie wrote: > > See https://agoranomic.github.io/ADoP/ for past,

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Is the duplicated report body an error? -o > On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Quazie wrote: > > See https://agoranomic.github.io/ADoP/ > for past, current, and future > reports. > >

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Thank you for filling most of the offices. It seems I am the only one who is behind on reports. I will investigate publishing a new monthly report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On May 26, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

NttPF -Aris On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Well, I will CoE. CoE: The speaker is not electable. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Aris Merchant >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Well, I will CoE. CoE: The speaker is not electable. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > Minor mistake here: The speaker is

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > Minor mistake here: The speaker is not 'Electable' due to its nature. > Since that's not a required field, I don't think I need to resubmit but > feel free to CoE if I do. > CFJ 1420 applies here (it says that even informal

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Minor mistake here: The speaker is not 'Electable' due to its nature. Since that's not a required field, I don't think I need to resubmit but feel free to CoE if I do. On 05/18/17 16:06, Nic Evans wrote: > I deputise for ADoP to publish the following report: > >