DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8016-8022

[Alexis Hunt]

On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 at 00:42 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 3.0, the voting method is AI-majority and the valid options
> are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional
> votes).
>
> ID Author(s)AI   Title   Pender  Pend fee
> ---
> 8016*  Alexis   2.4  PCOF [1]Alexis  3 sh.
>
FOR

> 8017*  Alexis   3.0  RTRW Cleanups   Alexis  WO [2]
>
FOR

> 8018*  Alexis   3.0  Random Bad Rule CleaningAlexis  WO [2]
>
FOR

> 8019*  Alexis   3.0  Crime ReformAlexis  WO [2]
>
FOR

> 8020*  Aris, Ørjan  2.0  Office Restructuring v2 Aris3 sh.
>
FOR

> 8021*  G.   2.0  Limit Numerical silliness   G.  3 sh.
>
FOR

> 8022*  G.   1.0  Anyone can balance KarmaG.  3 sh.
>
FOR

> 8023*  G., Aris 2.0  Zombie Lots G.  3 sh.
>
PRESENT

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8016-8022

[Gaelan Steele]

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 9:41 PM, Aris Merchant 
>  wrote:
> 
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 3.0, the voting method is AI-majority and the valid options
> are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional
> votes).
> 
> ID Author(s)AI   Title   Pender  Pend fee
> ---
> 8016*  Alexis   2.4  PCOF [1]Alexis  3 sh.
FOR
> 8017*  Alexis   3.0  RTRW Cleanups   Alexis  WO [2]
FOR
> 8018*  Alexis   3.0  Random Bad Rule CleaningAlexis  WO [2]
FOR
> 8019*  Alexis   3.0  Crime ReformAlexis  WO [2]
FOR
> 8020*  Aris, Ørjan  2.0  Office Restructuring v2 Aris3 sh.
FOR
> 8021*  G.   2.0  Limit Numerical silliness   G.  3 sh.
FOR
> 8022*  G.   1.0  Anyone can balance KarmaG.  3 sh.
PRESENT
> 8023*  G., Aris 2.0  Zombie Lots G.  3 sh.
FOR
> 
> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
> 
> IDAuthor(s) AI   Title
> ---
> pp1   Alexis1.0  Supportive Proposals
> 
> 
> [1] Paradoxical Contract Obligation Fix
> [2] Pended Without Objection
> 
> Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
> 
> A proposal may be pended for 3 shinies or Without Objection.
> 
> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
> 
> //
> ID: 8016
> Title: Paradoxical Contract Obligation Fix
> Adoption index: 2.4
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
> 
> 
> Amend Rule 2523 "Contracts as Agreements" by replacing "If whether an
> action is permitted or forbidden by a contract" with "If whether an action
> is permitted, forbidden, required, or made optional by a contract".
> 
> //
> ID: 8017
> Title: RTRW Cleanups
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
> 
> 
> Amend Rule 1688 (Power) by deleting the paragraph "Power less than one is
> called Ephemeral power, and an instrument with a power less than one is an
> Ephemeral instrument.".
> 
> Amend Rule 2141 (Role and Attributes of Rules) by replacing "the
> Rulekeepor SHALL assign a title" with "the Rulekeepor CAN and SHALL assign
> a title".
> 
> Amend Rule 2221 (Cleanliness) by replacing "capitalization," with
> "capitalization, formatting,". [I wanted to clean up some list bullet
> formatting, but found the rule doesn't allow it.]
> 
> Amend Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction) by replacing "the Executor of the
> announcement of intent is not eligible" with "the initiator of the intent
> is not eligible". [This deserves a note: we previously defined the Executor
> of a message to be the player who sent it, but that definition disappeared
> at some time. The effect was that if you were acting on behalf of someone
> else to intend something, you couldn't support the intent. But this wording
> accomplishes roughly the same effect, since under the old interpretation
> you could just have the player you acted on behalf of to intend the intent
> support it, seeing as there was no prohibition on it.]
> 
> Amend Rules 1728 (Dependent Actions) and 2124, in that order, by replacing
> each instance of "With N Supporters" (case-insensitive) with "With N
> Support".
> 
> Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing "within a week" with "in
> a timely fashion".
> 
> Amend Rule 2492 (Recusal) to read as follows:
>   A judge CAN recuse emself from a CFJ e is assigned to by
>   announcement. When a judge recuses emself from a CFJ, then
> 
>   * the CFJ becomes unassigned;
> 
>   * the recused judge becomes ineligible to be assigned as a judge
> for a week; and
> 
>   * the recused judge SHOULD suggest another judge for the CFJ to
> make the Arbitor's job easier.
> 
> Amend Rule 2427 (Yellow Cards), by replacing "MAY" with "CAN",
> 
> Amend Rule 2449 (Winning the Game) by adding "once, by announcement" after
> "Patent Title of Champion".
> 
> Amend Rule 2509 (Numerical Switches) by replacing "In particular, a
> "natural" switch is a switch with possible values of the non-negative
> integers." with "In particular, a natural or integer switch is a switch
> with possible values the non-negative integers or all integers,
> respectively."
> 
> //
> ID: 8018
> Title: Random Bad Rule Cleaning
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
> 
> 
> Repeal Rule 2443 (Expediting Proposals).
> Repeal Rule 2431 (Proposal Competitions).
> Repeal Rule 2530 (Poetry Duel Challenge Writ).
> Amend Rule 2160 

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8016-8022

[Aris Merchant]

Oops, forgot to change the title. It doesn't really matter though.

-Aris

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Aris Merchant
 wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 3.0, the voting method is AI-majority and the valid options
> are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional
> votes).
>
> ID Author(s)AI   Title   Pender  Pend fee
> ---
> 8016*  Alexis   2.4  PCOF [1]Alexis  3 sh.
> 8017*  Alexis   3.0  RTRW Cleanups   Alexis  WO [2]
> 8018*  Alexis   3.0  Random Bad Rule CleaningAlexis  WO [2]
> 8019*  Alexis   3.0  Crime ReformAlexis  WO [2]
> 8020*  Aris, Ørjan  2.0  Office Restructuring v2 Aris3 sh.
> 8021*  G.   2.0  Limit Numerical silliness   G.  3 sh.
> 8022*  G.   1.0  Anyone can balance KarmaG.  3 sh.
> 8023*  G., Aris 2.0  Zombie Lots G.  3 sh.
>
> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
>
> IDAuthor(s) AI   Title
> ---
> pp1   Alexis1.0  Supportive Proposals
>
>
> [1] Paradoxical Contract Obligation Fix
> [2] Pended Without Objection
>
> Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
>
> A proposal may be pended for 3 shinies or Without Objection.
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
>
> //
> ID: 8016
> Title: Paradoxical Contract Obligation Fix
> Adoption index: 2.4
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2523 "Contracts as Agreements" by replacing "If whether an
> action is permitted or forbidden by a contract" with "If whether an action
> is permitted, forbidden, required, or made optional by a contract".
>
> //
> ID: 8017
> Title: RTRW Cleanups
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 1688 (Power) by deleting the paragraph "Power less than one is
> called Ephemeral power, and an instrument with a power less than one is an
> Ephemeral instrument.".
>
> Amend Rule 2141 (Role and Attributes of Rules) by replacing "the
> Rulekeepor SHALL assign a title" with "the Rulekeepor CAN and SHALL assign
> a title".
>
> Amend Rule 2221 (Cleanliness) by replacing "capitalization," with
> "capitalization, formatting,". [I wanted to clean up some list bullet
> formatting, but found the rule doesn't allow it.]
>
> Amend Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction) by replacing "the Executor of the
> announcement of intent is not eligible" with "the initiator of the intent
> is not eligible". [This deserves a note: we previously defined the Executor
> of a message to be the player who sent it, but that definition disappeared
> at some time. The effect was that if you were acting on behalf of someone
> else to intend something, you couldn't support the intent. But this wording
> accomplishes roughly the same effect, since under the old interpretation
> you could just have the player you acted on behalf of to intend the intent
> support it, seeing as there was no prohibition on it.]
>
> Amend Rules 1728 (Dependent Actions) and 2124, in that order, by replacing
> each instance of "With N Supporters" (case-insensitive) with "With N
> Support".
>
> Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing "within a week" with "in
> a timely fashion".
>
> Amend Rule 2492 (Recusal) to read as follows:
>A judge CAN recuse emself from a CFJ e is assigned to by
>announcement. When a judge recuses emself from a CFJ, then
>
>* the CFJ becomes unassigned;
>
>* the recused judge becomes ineligible to be assigned as a judge
>  for a week; and
>
>* the recused judge SHOULD suggest another judge for the CFJ to
>  make the Arbitor's job easier.
>
> Amend Rule 2427 (Yellow Cards), by replacing "MAY" with "CAN",
>
> Amend Rule 2449 (Winning the Game) by adding "once, by announcement" after
> "Patent Title of Champion".
>
> Amend Rule 2509 (Numerical Switches) by replacing "In particular, a
> "natural" switch is a switch with possible values of the non-negative
> integers." with "In particular, a natural or integer switch is a switch
> with possible values the non-negative integers or all integers,
> respectively."
>
> //
> ID: 8018
> Title: Random Bad Rule Cleaning
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Repeal Rule 2443 (Expediting Proposals).
> Repeal Rule 2431 (Proposal Competitions).
> Repeal Rule 2530 (Poetry Duel Challenge Writ).
> Amend Rule